MHB Finding the equation of parabola

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamescv31
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the equation of a parabola given the directrix x = -1, axis y = 2, and a latus rectum of length 2. The vertex is determined to be either (-1/2, 1) or (-3/2, 1), depending on the direction the parabola opens. The distance from the vertex to the focus is calculated as 1/2, which corresponds to the latus rectum being four times that distance. The analysis confirms that the length of the latus rectum is indeed 2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the vertex, focus, and directrix in parabola equations.
jamescv31
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Greetings, I‘m trying to analyze the given of directrix x = -1, axis y = 2, and latus rectum as 2

I believe there‘s two possibility equations.

I‘m not sure for finding the vertex since I got between ( -.5, 0) and origin itself.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I presume that, by "latus rectum as 2", you mean that the length of the latus rectum is 2. In a parabola that is always 4 times the distance from the vertex to the focus so that distance is 1/2. that is also the distance from the vertex to the directrix so the vertex must be at (-1+ 1/2, 1)= (-1/2, 1) (with the parabola opening in the positive x direction) or at (-1- 1/2, 1)= (-3/2, 1) (with the parabola opening in the negative x direction).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes the length of latus rectum is 2
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top