MHB Finding the final distance for the compressing in a spring system

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a 5.00 kg box sliding at 2.40 m/s that compresses a spring with a constant of 2230 N/m. The Work-Energy Theorem can be applied, equating the initial kinetic energy of the box to the potential energy stored in the spring at maximum compression. The derived formula for the final compression distance, xc, is xc = √(m/k) * vi, which shows how changes in mass, spring stiffness, and initial velocity affect the compression distance. The solution also confirms that the approach is dimensionally consistent and logically sound. Thus, the final compression of the spring can be accurately determined using these principles.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Every one,

Here is the question to the problem:

As shown in the figure below, a box of mass m = 5.00 kg is sliding across a horizontal frictionless surface with an initial speed vi = 2.40 m/s when it encounters a spring of constant k = 2230 N/m. The box comes momentarily to rest after compressing the spring some amount xc. Determine the final compression xc of the spring.
7-p-028.gif



Is there way to use the Work-Energy Thereom to solve this problem? If so, you help me through step by step directions?
Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kinetic energy of the mass = potential energy stored in the spring

graph of kinetic energy and elastic potential energy vs position ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's look at this dynamically, where time $t=0$ coincides with the time the box first contacts the spring, and orient our $x$-axis of motion such that the origin coincides with the point where the box first contacts the spring. Using Newton's 2nd law of motion, and Hooke's law we obtain the IVP:

$$mx''(t)=-kx(t)$$ where $$x'(0)=v_i,\,x(0)=0$$

Let's write the ODE in standard linear form:

$$x''(t)+\frac{k}{m}x(t)=0$$

By the theory of 2nd order linear homogeneous ODE's, we know the solution will take the form:

$$x(t)=c_1\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)+c_2\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

Hence:

$$x'(t)=-c_1\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)+c_2\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

Using the given initial conditions, we obtain the system:

$$0=c_1$$

$$v_i=c_2\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\implies c_2=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i$$

And so the solution to the IVP is given by:

$$x(t)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$ where $$0\le t\le\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\pi$$

And we have:

$$x'(t)=v_i\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

When the spring reaches maximal compression, we must have:

$$x'(t)=0\implies \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t=\frac{\pi}{2}\implies t=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}$$

And so we find:

$$x_c=x\left(\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\cdot\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i$$

Now, if we use energy considerations, we know the initial kinetic energy of the box must equal the work done to compress the spring when the spring reaches maximal compression:

$$\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2=\frac{1}{2}kx_c^2$$

Solving for $x_c$, we find:

$$x_c=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\quad\checkmark$$

Notice this formula is not only dimensionally consistent, but it also makes sense when we look at what happens when we change any of the parameters:

  • Increase/decrease the mass of the box, and the compression distance increases/decreases too.
  • Increase/decrease the stiffness of the spring and the compression distance decreases/increases.
  • Increase/decrease the initial velocity of the box, and the compression distance increases/decreases too.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top