MHB Finding the Leg Lengths of a Right Triangle with an Acute Angle of 22°

AI Thread Summary
To find the leg lengths of a right triangle with a 22° acute angle, the tangent function is applied, where tan(22°) equals approximately 0.40. The options provided are evaluated by dividing the lengths of the legs to see which pair yields a tangent value closest to 0.40. The calculation shows that the leg lengths of 2 and 5 (choice a) result in a tangent value of 0.40, confirming it as the correct answer. The discussion concludes with affirmation of the solution's accuracy.
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
A right triangle has an acute angle measure of 22°. Which two numbers could represent the lengths of the legs of this triangle?

OPTIONS

a. 2 and 5

b. 1 and 5

c. 3 and 5

d. 4 and 5

I know that each leg represents the sides of the right triangle opposite the hypotenuse. I think the tangent function works best here.

tan(x) = opp/adj

tan(22°) = 0.4040262258

After rounding 0.4040262258 to two decimal places, I get 0.40.

I will divide the left side number by the right side number per choice given.

2/5 = 0.40

1/5 = 0.20

3/5 = 0.80

4/5 = 0.80

I say the answer is choice a.

Choice a = tan(22°).

Is this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks good. 😁
 
MarkFL said:
Looks good. 😁

Thank you, Mark. Check your PM here.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top