Finding the Optimal Aperture Stop for a Portrait Photo

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aelo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photo
AI Thread Summary
To determine the optimal aperture stop for a portrait photo at a distance of 6 m, the photographer needs to limit image blur to one pixel, approximately 0.26 mm. The depth of field (DOF) equation is crucial, and the photographer is considering f/4, f/8, or f/16 to achieve a DOF of about 0.5 m. There is confusion regarding the sensor pixel size and its relation to the aperture diameter (D) and the F-number (F#). The photographer is contemplating whether to apply the paraxial approximation and how to calculate the necessary parameters for each aperture setting. Ultimately, the goal is to find the aperture that yields the desired depth of field while maintaining sharpness within the constraints of the given equipment.
Aelo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A photographer is taking a portrait photo of a person at 6 m distance from his digital camera, which has a sensor pixel size of 10 μm and is equipped with a f = 100 mm thin lens. Image blur is supposed to be limited to the size of one pixel. Which of the following aperture stops: f/4, f/8, or f/16 should the photographer select in order to get a depth of field of about 0.5 m?

Homework Equations



Depth of field = δz = (2*l*ρ*D)/(D2 - ρ2)
ρ = -ρ'*l/l' = ρ'[(l/f) -1]
F# relates to f such that, if F# = 8, you have an f/8 aperture stop.
Using the paraxial approximation for a single lens, F# = f/D
For a single lens with diameter D and a stop at the lens, NA = D/(2*f)
F# = 1/(2*NA) by definition
For a general system, F# = f/(2*he) with he being the height of the entrance pupil

The Attempt at a Solution



We know ρ' = 1 pixel ≈ 0.26 mm. l = 6000 mm. I'm not sure what sensor pixel size describes - is it D? If it is, I'm confused about when I can use F# = f/D. I know the paraxial approximation is used only at very small angles, so maybe that equation isn't valid when we're 6 m away. Maybe I can't use that, but if the sensor pixel size is D, I could plug into the NA equation - but again, I feel that this would be too simple, so I think I'm oversimplifying it. Since I'm given ρ', l, and f, I could find ρ, and maybe I'm supposed to find ρ for each of the different f's (using the given F#'s and multiplying by D)and just plug into the δz equation to see which gives me the result closest to 0.5 m. This confuses me somewhat as f was given to be 100 mm, so how could f be anything else?
Thanks in advance. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump. :(
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...

Similar threads

Back
Top