I Fine Structure Constant - 10 steps

Garry Goodwin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Alternative calculation for fine structure constant based on the proton / electron mass ratio.
An alternative method to calculate the fine structure constant as a function of the proton \ electron mass ratio. Equation 8 with the delta fudge factor gives the same value for alpha as equation 1 (test it yourself). Delta is close to zero, so if this approach is telling us something about the fine structure constant, maybe delta ought to be zero. Thoughts?
Screenshot 2023-12-09 at 12.17.03.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please post the reference to the professional scientific literature where this calculation is derived.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Vanadium 50 and pinball1970
I'd need to be convinced this is more than numerology to even know where to start. And this looks like numerology with a fudge factor... the possibilities are endless!
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, pinball1970 and phinds
Dale said:
Please post the reference to the professional scientific literature where this calculation is derived.
No professional literature that I know.
 
Garry Goodwin said:
No professional literature that I know.
I am sorry, we do not provide any form of pre-publication support. This thread is closed.

You may want to review the forum rules to understand our mission and goals here.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top