A Finite-Discrete Element Method (FDEM) software recommendation

AI Thread Summary
FDEM software that accommodates poroelasticity and includes a hydraulic solver alongside a mechanics solver is sought after. The specificity of FDEM makes it challenging to find ready-made software that meets these requirements. An article was referenced that discusses particular codes related to FDEM. Mainstream commercial options like Ansys paired with RockyDEM may offer useful coupling capabilities for the desired simulations. Exploring common methods may also provide alternative solutions to the problem.
miraboreasu
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am looking for FDEM software that can do poroelasticity and has a hydraulic solver besides a mechanics solver.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
berkeman said:
Paging @FEAnalyst :smile:
Thank you for notifying me :-)

@miraboreasu Can you say what exactly you want to simulate ? FDEM is relatively new and quite specific so it may not be easy to find its ready-made software implementations (especially with those additional requirements). This article mentions some particular codes: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sv/2021/6622926/
But maybe your problem can be solved also with other, more common methods.

When it comes to mainstream commercial software, perhaps coupling of e.g. Ansys and RockyDEM could help you. Ansys itself also provides some CFD-DEM and FEA-DEM coupling capabilities.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes miraboreasu and berkeman
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top