Finite element method approximation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechanics_student
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite element method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the finite element method (FEM) using linear quadrilateral elements for spatial approximation. It highlights the mapping process from the reference element domain, which appears square, to the spatial element domain, emphasizing the role of basis functions in defining the quadrilateral shape. There is uncertainty regarding whether the approximated spatial coordinates represent an average of individual node coordinates. The conversation seeks clarification on these concepts to enhance understanding of the FEM process. Overall, the exchange aims to clarify the relationship between reference and spatial elements in FEM.
Mechanics_student
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
IMG_20240427_085227.jpg


In the picture above, we have on the left a figure representing spatial element, and on the right a figure representing reference element.

The type of element used in the method here is a linear quadrilateral element.

What I understand is moving or mapping from the reference element domain ##\Omega^R## where it seems that the quadrilateral element looks square; I don't understand why it is a square, to the spatial element domain ##\Omega^e##, we use with such mapping the basis functions.

I think the basis functions ##N## is what is giving us the quadrilateral shape?

For approximating spatial coordinates, ##x_i## at ##\Omega^e## is approximated by the summation over the nodal values ##x_i^k##, (here ##k## symbolizes node and ##i## symbolizes direction), I'm not sure if ##x_i## will be the average coordinate of the individual element since we're summing over the coordinates of each node.

Clarification is appreciated. Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top