First-Order Extrema in Classical Mechanics , Theoretical Minimum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Dr. Susskind's explanation of first-order extrema in classical mechanics, particularly in his Theoretical Minimum series. First-order refers to the approximation of functions using Taylor series expansion around a minimum, which simplifies calculations of potential and stationary points. The concept contrasts with older methods that relied on making small adjustments to achieve desired accuracy without formalizing the order of approximation. An example provided illustrates how a function can be approximated to first order, highlighting its relevance to understanding stationary points. This mathematical approach is essential for analyzing the behavior of systems in classical mechanics.
morangta
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
First-Order Extrema in "Classical Mechanics", Theoretical Minimum

In the 3rd lecture of Classical Mechanics, 2011, by Dr. Susskind in his Theoretical Minimum series, he talks about calculating extrema, saddle points, etc. to "first order".

"if you move a little bit, the potential is zero, to first order"

What does he mean, first order? When I was in college in the 60's, if we wanted better accuracy, we just made Δx smaller, and eventually got the accuracy we wanted.

No one talked about "first order" in the 60's. I think I would have remembered. Maybe not. I've noticed he keeps saying that. Is there something new in math and physics that I am not aware of?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He is talking about expanding the equation in a taylor series around the minimum

example

y(x) = sqrt(a^2-x^2) ; for x<<1 y(x) = sqrt(1 -(x/a)^2) ~ 1- (1/2)*(x/a)^2 and this would be to first order
 
What does that have to do with the stationary points?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
727
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
734
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top