Flying Capacitor Circuit Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing a flying capacitor circuit, particularly in the context of homework problems involving switch positions and potential differences. For part (a), the user successfully derives the voltage across the capacitor using Kirchhoff's laws and confirms it matches textbook equations. In part (b), confusion arises regarding the behavior of the circuit after the switches are flipped, specifically concerning current flow and voltage drop across R2. Clarification is provided by re-evaluating the circuit using Kirchhoff's voltage law, leading to the realization that the voltage across R2 can indeed be double the battery voltage. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding circuit behavior in DC-DC converters.
blondie68
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've attached the problem in the pdf, which includes the circuit diagram, but I'll copy the text of the problem here:

(a) Draw the equivalent circuit when the switches are in the position indicated in the diagram and
calculate the potential difference that develops across the capacitor in the limit when t  1/R1C.
(b) At some later time, the both S1 and S2 switched simultaneously. Draw the equivalent circuit
and calculate the potential difference across R2 the instant after this event.
In this type of curcuit is commonly found in DC-DC converters. In such a circuit configuration,
C is called a flying capacitor.

Homework Equations



Kirchhoff's laws, Ohm's law

V=IR for resistor, V=Q/C for capacitor

The Attempt at a Solution



a) the equivalent circuit is the voltage source with R1 and then C in series

using Kirchoff's loop law then,

V-IR1-Q/C=0

differentiating, and then integrating to solve for I, I get

I(t)=V/R1*e^(-t/R1C)

which matches the equation derived in my book for an RC circuit.

then, Vc=V(1-e^-t/R1C) where Vc is the voltage across the capacitor, which also matches the equation in my book.

Then, if t>>R1C, I said that Vc-->V

b) The equivalent circuit here with the switches flipped is the voltage source, then R2, then C all in series.

The problem I'm having arises here: If the C is fully charged where Vc=V when the switch is flipped, then no current should be able to flow to R2, and there shouldn't be any voltage drop.

This answer seems too trivial though, and seems to render this kind of circuit pointless. What am I missing here?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
blondie68 said:
The problem I'm having arises here: If the C is fully charged where Vc=V when the switch is flipped, then no current should be able to flow to R2, and there shouldn't be any voltage drop.

This answer seems too trivial though, and seems to render this kind of circuit pointless. What am I missing here?

Check the polarity of the voltage on the capacitor and do a Kirchoff voltage sum around the loop.
 
ahhh i think i see now. so the loop law would be V(battery)-V(capacitor)-V(R2)=0, so since Vb=Vc, the voltage across the resistor is double the battery voltage. that makes a lot more sense. thanks!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top