Force on solenoid in external uniform field?

AI Thread Summary
A long solenoid passing through a uniform magnetic field does not experience torque due to its internal field being masked by the windings, similar to a permanent magnet. The external magnetic field interacts primarily with the current flowing through the solenoid, generating a small force proportional to the current and the sine of the angle between the current and the external field. Each turn of the solenoid acts like a plane coil, experiencing a couple that adds up across all turns, regardless of their staggered arrangement. The discussion highlights the complexity of magnetic interactions, emphasizing that magnetic fields do not exert forces on each other directly. Ultimately, the solenoid's behavior in the external field can be conceptually likened to that of a permanent magnet, despite the absence of measurable flux outside the solenoid.
neosocra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A solenoid, of sufficient length to consider external flux to be zero, passes through a uniform magnetic field with significant length on both ends extending beyond the field.

Will a torque be exerted upon the solenoid ? Or do the windings effectively mask the internal solenoid field from the external? (again, with each solenoid pole well beyond the field; a very long permanent magnet would receive a torque, I'd imagine)

Would the vector orientation of the external uniform field relative to the B vector of the solenoid make any difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There would be the same torque as on a permanent magnet proportional
kXB (k is a vector along the axis of the solenoid.).
 
Since the external field of the solenoid is in opposite direction than the internal concentrated flux, I could see that field interfacing with the uniform external field, but with an opposite B vector. Is that what you mean?
 
The external uniform magnetic field acts ONLY on the current in the solenoid.
The result, though, is the same as if the solenoid were replaced by a permanent magnet.
Magnetic fields don't create force on other fields.
 
Each turn in the solenoid is almost a plane coil in itself, and experiences a pure couple in an external field. The couples on all the turns add together. The fact that the turns are staggered apart in space makes no difference to the addition.

There is, in fact a small BILsin(theta) force on the solenoid because there is a flow of current parallel to the solenoid axis, owing to the helical nature of the solenoid. [When Ampere was doing his pioneering experiments in the 1820s, and trying to make a pivoted solenoid behave like a magnet, he was at pains to neutralise this parallel-to-axis current with one in a wire running the other way.]
 
clem said:
The external uniform magnetic field acts ONLY on the current in the solenoid.
The result, though, is the same as if the solenoid were replaced by a permanent magnet.
Magnetic fields don't create force on other fields.

I simultaneously agree, and say "wait but..." to myself. Think about the classic method of visualizing the orbital magnetic field from a straight conductor and how that field creates flux density changes as the FIELDS intersect (or more accurately, Don't intersect) causing attraction on the point in the orbit parallel to the uniform field and repulsion when opposite (same analogy as parallel wires of same or opposite direction) *image attached*

I'm well aware that this is done as a tool to visualize effect and not the true cause of force that does come down to point charges in the conductor moving in the current. However, think of the Gilbert model for closely estimating forces between two magnets as point charges on the pole faces. Now we've modeled electrical charges in conductor as magnetic field / magnetic field interaction, and yet magnets as pretend electrical charges. However, in permanent magnet there is no moving point charge, only magnetic fields...

So it'd seem that the fact that no flux is measured outside a (long) solenoid then the effect from that current, add more specifically the charges its comprised of, is redirected by influence of neighboring loops, and thus my hypothesis of the uniform external field passing through a section would likewise not interact with those flowing charges, no matter how you model it... I'm also, like I lead off, expecting I'm wrong, I'm just not Yet reading an invalidation of my false (?) assumptions
 

Attachments

  • catapult-field.png
    catapult-field.png
    8.4 KB · Views: 510
Last edited:
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top