Force on wire by earth's mag. field

  • Thread starter Thread starter eroxore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Force Wire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force on a 50-meter long current-carrying wire in Earth's magnetic field, with an inclination angle of 70 degrees. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect force of approximately 2.2 N due to a misunderstanding of the magnetic field components. The correct approach involves using the effective magnetic field, calculated as Bsin(50), leading to the accurate force of 1.9 N. The error was identified as neglecting the perpendicular component of the horizontal magnetic field vector. The importance of correctly determining the effective magnetic field in such calculations is emphasized.
eroxore
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The task is to calculate the force acting on a 50 meter long current-carrying wire due to Earth's magnetic field. The angle of inclination is assumed to be 70 degrees. Here's a schematic diagram:

3ojZRL.png


The exaggeratedly drawn wire represents a segment of a wire on a power grid. In order to find the force, we need to find the component of Earth's magnetic field perpendicular to the direction of the current in the wire. I began therefore by calculating the vertical component of Earth's magnetic field, yielding B_{vert.} = 50\sin 70^\circ. Let's now redraw the picture with only the vertical component:

3Hy5zD.png


We see now that the perpendicular component of can be calculated as the sin(70) of the vertical component. Thus B_{\perp} = 50\sin 70^\circ \cdot \sin 70^\circ. We can finally use F = IlB to calculate the force and we end up with approximately 2.2 N.

This is however wrong and the actual answer is in fact 1.9 N. The "accepted" approach is to use sin(50) of Earth's magnetic field. I fully understand this, but what I want to unveil is why my approach failed. What exactly was wrong in my arguments? The math or the physics?

Help very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, well as you say, you understand what to do.
You indeed need to use F=BIL, since B_{effective} is Bsin(70-20), B_{effective} is 50μTsin(50)
Putting in the correct values give the correct answer of 1.9 N

Your approach seems a bit odd, you use two times sin(70), I can't figure out which component you want to calculate.
 
Nevermind, I figured out myself why my approach was failing. I forgot to consider the perpendicular component of the horizontal component of Earth's magnetic field vector.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top