Formalization of sqroot definition

  • Thread starter peos69
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Definition
In summary: Q.E.D.In summary, this conversation focuses on formalizing the definition of square roots and proving relevant theorems. The definition is given as the function \surd: \mathbb{R}_{> 0} \to \mathbb{R}_{> 0}, x \mapsto \sqrt{x} satisfying (\sqrt{x})^2 = x and \sqrt{1} = 1. The formalized definition involves sets and ordered pairs, and it is mentioned that a continuous function is required for a proper definition. The conversation also discusses the formalization of the limit of a function and the importance of understanding the negation of a definition in mathematical analysis. Finally, there is a
  • #71
Gokul43201 said:
:



, if you don't wish to get booted from here.


nice expression,good english
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #72
peos69: Which part of my post only applies to x >= 0? The definition of f? That's true, but in high school I don't think most students learn about the square root of negative numbers; that is, they consider the square root function as a real-valued function. It would not be too difficult to extend my definition and proofs to make f complex-valued, and defined everywhere on R.

are you saying that I only proved that f(x^2) = abs(x) if x>=0? You are mistaken. I proved first that f(x^2) = abs(x) if x>0, then I used that fact to prove that f(x^2) = abs(x) if x<0. Then I pointed out that f(0) = 0. So,
If x > 0 f(x^2) = |x|
if x = 0 f(x^2) = |x|
if x < 0 f(x^2) = |x|. So in all cases, f(x^2) = |x|.
Do you see any specific problems with my proof? Or any other problems with the theory of the square root function that I developed in my post? I wrote it at about three in the morning and may well have made some mistakes!

Also, what precisely do you mean by "formalise"? I think if you made that clear we would be able to help you much better.

Please answer ALL the questions in this thread before posting again.
 
  • #73
peos69 said:
nice expression,good english

peos69, Gokul is pointing out that we have Rules here on the PF, and it all works best if we check our attitudes at the door, and discuss the math and physics in a straightforward way. The Mentors are monitoring this thread, obviously.
 
Last edited:
  • #74
Is it in your rules to use expressions "if you don't wish to get booted from here"
I am surprised.
 
  • #75
peos69 said:
Is it in your rules to use expressions "if you don't wish to get booted from here"
I am surprised.

It is a common expression in English, and not considered rude in this context. Just keep a calm attitude, and focus on the math and the physics. And as Gokul was pointing out, all capital letters is considered yelling in the context of forum discussions, and should be avoided.
 
  • #76
can i then in a common expression in English say to him boot yourself?
capital letters are considered for emphasizing things
 
  • #77
You can emphasize things using italics with the [ i] [/ i] tag (without spaces), for example. That is already a lot nicer (and using Control + I, no more work than pressing Caps Lock twice).

the problem is yours that you cannot give a proper formalization of a h.school concept
The problem is not mine, because I am perfectly happy with my "formalization". If you are not, you should specify what you mean by a "formalization" (as pointed out repeatedly) and what there is as a "concept" to the square root.
 
  • #78
peos69 said:
can i then in a common expression in English say to him boot yourself?

No, at this point that would be rude. It has nothing to do with the math and physics of this thread. He was pointing out the fact that you could receive infraction points for the aggressive nature of your posts. You would not be pointing out anything useful with the reply that you propose.

peos69 said:
capital letters are considered for emphasizing things

Not in the context of web forum discussions, especially not the way you used them.

This thread appears to have run its course. Thread locked.
 
  • #79
Note that "boot yourself" is quite different in meaning from "booted from here". The first implies physical violence while the second doesn't.

What has happened so far is that many people have given different types of "formalization" of the square root function and you have rejected them all. Will you please tell us what you mean by "formalization"?
 
  • #80
HallsofIvy said:
Will you please tell us what you mean by "formalization"?

Actually, that might be kind of hard for him. I already locked the thread. It's probably best to just let it lie, unless you want to unlock and carry on. I'm fine either way.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top