Forming Linear Equations From Non-Linear Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rearranging the equation T = 2pi [(32 L I)/(pi S d^4)]^1/2 to form a linear equation suitable for graphing. The main challenge is identifying the +b segment in the linear equation format y=mx+b, as the original equation consists of multiplication without an obvious additive constant. A suggested approach is to take the logarithm of the equation, which can help linearize the relationship between the variables. The user proposes graphing T^2 against L, with T^2 as y and L as x, while treating the constants S, d, and I as fixed parameters. This method allows for a linear representation, acknowledging that any intercept may result from experimental error.
K - Prime
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
For my first year formal lab I am having a little bit of trouble with one aspect, let's see if anyone can help

Im trying to rearrange the equation

T = 2pi [(32 L I)/(pi S d^4)]^1/2

...(sorry, i don't know how to use the better way of displaying math) to form a linear equation so it can be graphed as a line, but I am having a rough time of it. My biggest problem seems to be getting the + b segment (for the form y=mx+b), the + sign doesn't seem to want to show up when the origional equation is all multiplication. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which are variables and which are constants.

The simplest way of linearising products of things to various powers is simply to take logs.
 
Its an equation relating to a torsional pendulum with a metal disk at the end

I = moment of inertia for disk
L = length of suspending wire
S = shear modulus
d = diameter of suspending wire
T = period of rotation

the constants are S d and I

i think i need to graph T against L somehow
Ill give the log thing a shot
 
Last edited:
how does this sound, checking to see if I am in the ball park

T^2 = {[4 pi (32) I]/(S d^4)} L

where T^2 = y L = x and everything in {} is m, guessing b doesn't apply here and any intercept on the graph can be attributed to error
 
Last edited:
That would work provided you don't change the parameters in the { }.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top