I Formula for the propagation of complex errors

AI Thread Summary
To propagate errors for complex measurements, the formula f(x, y) = f(x, y) ± √{(∂f/∂x * Δx)² + (∂f/∂y * Δy)²} is used, where x and y are expressed in polar coordinates as x + iy = Re^(iθ). An example function is f(x, y) = x + y², which yields a result of 7 ± 0.41 in the non-complex case. For complex numbers, the result should be expressed as (-18.0 ± 4.0) - (10.5 ± 1.9)i, with R = √(x² + y²) and θ = arctan(y/x). The variance of the amplitude in relation to the variances of the real and imaginary components may follow a Rayleigh distribution if variances are equal, but the generalization for unequal variances remains uncertain. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate error propagation in complex measurements.
accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
If I have 2 measurements ##x = (3.0 ± 0.1), y = (-2.0 ± 0.1)## and want to calculate how the error propagates when calculating a function from those values this formula should be used: ##f(x, y) = f(x, y) ± \sqrt {(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}*\Delta x)^2+(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}*\Delta y)^2}##
What is the formula for calculating error propagation if x and y are complex (##x = (3 ± 0.1) + (9.5 ± 0.4)ⅈ, y = (2 ± 0.1) - (5 ± 0.4)ⅈ##)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Change to polar coordinates.
 
Can you give me an example. Suppose the function is: ##f(x, y) = x + y^2##
In the non-complex case, with the data given in the previous post, I would proceed as follows:
##f(x, y) = x + y^2 = (3+(-2)^2) \pm \sqrt{0.1^2+(2*(-2) *0.1)^2}= 7\pm \sqrt{0.01+0.16}=7\pm0.41##
How can I change to polar coordinates to get the result in case of complex numbers?
The result should be: ##(-18.0 ± 4.0) - (10.5 ± 1.9)ⅈ## (Measurement jl)
 
x+iy\equiv Re^{i\theta}where R=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} and \theta =\arctan(\frac{y}{x}). This is the easiest representation for complex multiplication (you multiply the argumets and add the angles). Complex addition is easiest in the cartesian notation.
 
I got stuck, not able to get the result. Can someone show me how to do it please?
 
Svein said:
Change to polar coordinates.
After that, you'd have to know the variance of the amplitude as a function of the variances of the real and imaginary components. If they had the same variance, I think you'd have a Rayleigh distribution. I'm not sure how that generalizes to the case of unequal variances. Does that distribution have a special name?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top