Foucault pendulum and a round globe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the use of Foucault pendulums to demonstrate Earth's rotation and shape, suggesting that their varying precession angles at different latitudes could indicate a spherical Earth. Participants note that installing pendulums at the same altitude is less critical than ensuring they are densely spaced to confirm smoothness across locations. The conversation also touches on the assumption of gravity models, which could imply an equipotential surface without the need for pendulums. Additionally, some argue that observing the North Star's position could provide evidence of latitude, though historical variability complicates this. Ultimately, the Foucault pendulum serves as a significant tool in understanding Earth's dynamics.
xaratustra
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Imagine we are all cavemen without satellite technology and just discovered the Foucault pendulum! As we know the angle of presession depends on the latitude. This can be used to prove that the Earth is rotating, right? Now by putting several Foucault pendula around the Earth, at equidistant longitude and latitude, can we prove that the Earth is a sphere as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xaratustra said:
Now by putting several Foucault pendula around the Earth, at equidistant longitude and latitude, can we prove that the Earth is a sphere as well?
You could exclude a lot of potential shapes, and by assuming certain smoothness between your sample positions narrow it down to a sphere.
 
cool. then all pendula must be installed at the same altitude to guarantee smoothness. :smile:
 
xaratustra said:
cool. then all pendula must be installed at the same altitude to guarantee smoothness. :smile:
It's not about the altitude, but how densely they are spaced.

Also, since pendulums are based on gravity, you have to assume some model of gravity, which by itself might already imply an equipotential surface, without even the need for swinging pendulums.
 
Last edited:
xaratustra said:
Imagine we are all cavemen without satellite technology and just discovered the Foucault pendulum! As we know the angle of presession depends on the latitude. This can be used to prove that the Earth is rotating, right? Now by putting several Foucault pendula around the Earth, at equidistant longitude and latitude, can we prove that the Earth is a sphere as well?

Wouldn't it be much easier for them to just glance at the sky and notice how the position of the North Star varies with latitude?
(Flaw: The North Star moves, it was not north in all periods of history.)
 
If it was (very) cloudy all over the Earth, it would be harder to arrive at an initial Geocentric model Universe but the Fuocault pendulums would definitely indicate rotation. No one would every have moved to a Heliocentric model, I reckon ('till Radio came along).
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top