How Long Does It Take for a Handle to Become Unbearably Hot?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between temperature changes in a handle as it heats up. Participants clarify that the change in temperature, ΔT, is not the same on both sides of the equation, as temperature varies along the handle's length. They assume the temperature in the handle is uniform and primarily a function of time rather than distance. The final equation derived allows for integration, leading to a solution for the temperature change over time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the constants involved in the temperature calculations.
WWCY
476
14

Homework Statement


The question below is asking how long it would take for the cooler side of the handle to heat up till its unbearably hot.
Screen Shot 2017-11-17 at 12.54.23 AM.png


I'm having a bit of trouble trying to understand the solution and would like some guidance.

I can't seem to get how the that represents the change in the cooler handle's average temperature is related to that came from .

For example, if I had some spatial variable , and represents a small change in , it makes sense to integrate over .

In this case represents a function of the difference in temperature from end to end, and doesn't seem like it's a small change of that function.

Could someone guide me towards the right interpretation? Thanks!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-11-17 at 12.54.23 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-17 at 12.54.23 AM.png
    33.5 KB · Views: 1,031
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

You are right about this, ΔT is not the same in both sides of the equation.
In addition, T will be a function of x too, warmer near the second (hot) block and cooler in the other end.

But let's assume that T (in the handle block) is uniform and T is a function of time only (and not of distance). And let's assume that Δx=l/2 (the distance in which heat is transferred). Then the final equation is
where T0 is the initial temperature of the handle block.

It seems that we can integrate this equation without problems because d(T-T0)=dT=d(T-Th) So, if we substitute d(T-T0) with d(T-Th) and separate the equation, we get FInally, if we substitute T-Th=ΔT, we get the same solution for ΔΤ (ΔT0=T0-Th).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DoItForYourself said:
Hello,

You are right about this, ΔT is not the same in both sides of the equation.
In addition, T will be a function of x too, warmer near the second (hot) block and cooler in the other end.

But let's assume that T (in the handle block) is uniform and T is a function of time only (and not of distance). And let's assume that Δx=l/2 (the distance in which heat is transferred). Then the final equation is $$\frac {d(T-T_0)} {dt} = - \frac {T-T_h} {\tau}$$
where T0 is the initial temperature of the handle block.

It seems that we can integrate this equation without problems because d(T-T0)=dT=d(T-Th) So, if we substitute d(T-T0) with d(T-Th) and separate the equation, we get $$\frac {d(T-T_h)} {T-T_h} = - \frac {dt} {\tau}$$ FInally, if we substitute T-Th=ΔT, we get the same solution for ΔΤ (ΔT0=T0-Th).
Hi there, apologies for the delayed reply as I have been working on some other things recently.

Is this to say that the small increase in temperature of the cooler bit from its original temperature is also a small increase of temperature towards as given by ?

Thanks for assisting!
 
WWCY said:
Hi there, apologies for the delayed reply as I have been working on some other things recently.

Is this to say that the small increase in temperature of the cooler bit from its original temperature ##d(T - T_0)## is also a small increase of temperature towards ##T_h## as given by ##\Delta T = T - T_h##?

Thanks for assisting!

Yes, because T0 and Th are constants.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top