Fraction of Hydrogen Atoms in First Excited State

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the fraction of hydrogen atoms in the first excited state at a star's surface temperature of 8000 K. The energy difference between the ground state and the first excited state is given as 10.2 eV. Participants suggest using the Boltzmann factor to determine the probability of an electron being in the excited state, leading to the equation P(E_1)/P(E_0) = e^(-ΔE/kT). The approach emphasizes that since most electrons are in the ground state, P(E_0) can be approximated as 1. The conversation concludes with a consensus on applying the Boltzmann factor for accurate calculations.
burg25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Homework Statement
The temperature of the surface of a certain star is 8000 K. Most hydrogen atoms at the surface of the star are in the electronic ground state. What is the approximate fraction of the hydrogen atoms that are in the first excited state (and therefore could emit a photon)? The energy of the first excited state above the ground state is (-13.6/22 eV) - (-13.6 eV) = 10.2 eV = 1.632e-18 J.

Homework Equations


Kb = 1.38e-23 J/K
1/T = E/Kb

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really know how to do this problem. My guess was to divide the energy in joules by the temperature and then divide by the Boltzmann constant to make it unitless.

(1.632e-18/8000)/(1.38e-23)=14.8
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm... You are right so far, but you might want to use the Boltzmann factor for this problem as well.
 
What do you mean? Could you clarify?
 
Wait I think I understand. Are you saying take e raised to this value?
 
Yeah I got it. Thanks
 
Yes, using the Boltzmann factor you get:

\frac{P(E_1)}{P(E_0)} = e^{-\frac{E_1-E_0}{kT}}

where P(E) is the probability the electron is in the state with energy E.

Since a vast majority of the electrons are in the ground state, you can say P(E_0)\approx 1.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top