Free relativistic particle (wave function)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the wave function of a free relativistic particle at time t>0, starting from the initial wave function ψ_0(x) and using the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The Hamiltonian is defined as H=√(p²c²+m²c⁴), and the solution involves transforming the wave function into momentum space. Participants clarify that the initial wave function can be expressed in terms of its Fourier transform, leading to the time-dependent solution involving a double integral. The final expression for the wave function at time t incorporates the energy term and requires careful handling of momentum variables. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying Fourier transforms and the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
bjogae
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The hamiltonian of a free relativistic particle moving along the x-axis is taken to be H=\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4} where p is the momentum operator. If the state of the wave function at time t=0 is described by the wave function \psi_0(x) what is the wave function at time t>0 Hint: solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in momentum space. The answer can be left in the form of an integral.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


In momentum space \psi(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_k \phi(k) e^{i k x}
does this mean that \psi_0(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_k \phi_0(k) e^{i k x}
and how do i know what \phi_0(k) is?

Is the right answer something in form of \psi_0(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_k \phi_0(k) e^{i k x}e^{i E t/\hbar} where i just kind of write down the usual derivation of the time-dependent schrödinger equation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can get \phi_0(k) from \psi_0(x) by taking its Fourier transform.

Your final answer will involve a double integral, and come from

\psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\oint\phi(k,t)e^{ikx}dx

You will need to determine \phi(k,t) from \phi_0(k) by solving the time-dependent Schroedinger equation.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
You can get \phi_0(k) from \psi_0(x) by taking its Fourier transform.

So i get \phi_0(p)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_k \psi_0(x) e^{i p x} ?

gabbagabbahey said:
Your final answer will involve a double integral, and come from

\psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\oint\phi(k,t)e^{ikx}dx

You will need to determine \phi(k,t) from \phi_0(k) by solving the time-dependent Schroedinger equation.

Then i solve the time dependent as following:
H\phi_0 = E \phi_0 \, where H=\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}Is it so, that:
\phi(p,\,t)= A(t) \phi_0(p) \
which leads to
\Phi(p,\,t) = \phi_0(p) e^{-i{E t/\hbar}} \,
and then
\psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int dpe^{-i{E t/\hbar}}e^{ip x} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} (\int \psi_0(x) e^{i p x} dx)
 
Is this correct? It seems to be ok to me.
 
bjogae said:
Then i solve the time dependent as following:
H\phi_0 = E \phi_0 \, where H=\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}

No, that's the time-independent Schroedinger equation...
 
gabbagabbahey said:
No, that's the time-independent Schroedinger equation...

Of course. So the time dependent looks like
i \hbar{\partial \over \partial t} \phi(p,\,t) = \hat H \phi(p,\,t)
and for
\hat H=\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}
it gives
\phi(p,\,t) = \phi(p,\,0)e^{-i\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}t/\hbar}
which would lead to (by the previous reasoning)
\psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int dpe^{-i\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}t/\hbar}e^{ip x} (\int \psi_0(x) e^{i p x} dx)
is this the answer?
 
bjogae said:
Of course. So the time dependent looks like
i \hbar{\partial \over \partial t} \phi(p,\,t) = \hat H \phi(p,\,t)
and for
\hat H=\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}
it gives
\phi(p,\,t) = \phi(p,\,0)e^{-i\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}t/\hbar}

Good:approve:

which would lead to (by the previous reasoning)
\psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int dpe^{-i\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}t/\hbar}e^{ip x} (\int \psi_0(x) e^{i p x} dx)
is this the answer?

Be careful, k=\frac{p}{\hbar}...so when you rewrite your Fourier transforms in terms of p instead of k, you should get some \hbars in there somewhere.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Good:approve:



Be careful, k=\frac{p}{\hbar}...so when you rewrite your Fourier transforms in terms of p instead of k, you should get some \hbars in there somewhere.

one more try

\psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi\hbar}\int dpe^{-i\sqrt{p^2c^2+m^2c^4}t/\\hbar}e^{ip x/\hbar} (\int \psi_0(x) e^{i p x/\hbar} dx)
which shold be correct if
k=\frac{p}{\hbar}
 
Looks good to me!:approve:
 
Back
Top