Frequency and penetration depth

AI Thread Summary
Increasing sound frequency leads to decreased penetration depth because higher frequencies have shorter wavelengths. The attenuation of sound waves is linked to how far they penetrate into a material, with higher frequencies requiring less distance to cover a single wavelength. This results in similar attenuation factors for different frequencies when penetrating the same material. The relationship between frequency, wavelength, and attenuation is crucial in understanding sound wave behavior in various media. Overall, the physics of sound wave reflection and attenuation parallels that of electromagnetic waves.
Mathysics
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
why does the increase of sound frequency will decrease the penetration depth?

how can this related to diffraction of sound?? Is it because they can be easily reflected??

need answer desperately, thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply because the wavelength of the sound wave decreases with increasing frequency and the attenuation of the wave is dependent upon the depth of penetration in terms of wavelengths. Given the same properties at 100 Hz and say 1 KHz, the waves will be attenuated by the same factor if both of them penetrate 1 wavelength into a lossy material. The difference though is that the 1 KHz will have to penetrate less distance to cover a single wavelength versus the 100 Hz.

Physically the reason is more complicated. I am not too sure about the physical explanations of attenuation and reflection when it comes to sound waves as I do electromagnetic waves but the physics are the same. I could attempt at an explanation but I'm sure that some of the other posters can do it far more competently.
 
Born2bwire said:
Simply because the wavelength of the sound wave decreases with increasing frequency and the attenuation of the wave is dependent upon the depth of penetration in terms of wavelengths. Given the same properties at 100 Hz and say 1 KHz, the waves will be attenuated by the same factor if both of them penetrate 1 wavelength into a lossy material. The difference though is that the 1 KHz will have to penetrate less distance to cover a single wavelength versus the 100 Hz.

Physically the reason is more complicated. I am not too sure about the physical explanations of attenuation and reflection when it comes to sound waves as I do electromagnetic waves but the physics are the same. I could attempt at an explanation but I'm sure that some of the other posters can do it far more competently.

ok thanks that was very useful!
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Back
Top