Friction Force and Distance Traveled

AI Thread Summary
To determine the distance a hockey puck slides before coming to rest, it is essential to calculate the net force acting on it, which includes friction. The puck has a mass of 0.12 kg and an initial speed of 5.3 m/s, with a coefficient of friction of 0.11. By applying the equation F(net) = ma and identifying the forces involved, including friction and weight, one can find the acceleration. Once the acceleration is known, it can be used to calculate the distance traveled before the puck stops. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Trenier
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At a local hockey rink, a puck with a mass of .12kg is given an initial speed of 5.3m/s. If the coefficient of friction is .11, what distance does the puck slide before coming to rest?


Homework Equations


F(net)=ma, F(friction)=Coeff. x F(normal)


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know where to start.. You can't find the acceleration because we don't know the time or distance, so how do you get the net force? If i could get the acceleration i could get the net force and then the distance. I am so lost..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Trenier, welcome to PF!
Use your first equation to solve for the acceleration. You know m, and you should be able to identify F_net. What forces act on the puck?
 
You can't use the first equation becuase you don't know the acceleration. Forces acting on the puck are the Force of the stick giving it the velocity, the normal force, the friction force and the weight.
 
Trenier said:
You can't use the first equation becuase you don't know the acceleration.
but you know the mass and you should know the net force acting on it in the horizontal direction.
Forces acting on the puck are the Force of the stick giving it the velocity,
yes, but this force disappears when the puck reaches its initial velocity and the stick loses contact with it
the normal force, the friction force and the weight.
yes, use these to calculate F_net.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
427
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Back
Top