Frictional force- sign convention

AI Thread Summary
In a horizontal spring-mass system, the frictional force is typically considered negative because it opposes the motion of the block. When the mass is released from the right, the friction force acts to the right, impeding the leftward motion. This leads to confusion regarding the sign convention, as work done by friction is negative when it opposes motion. The discussion clarifies that while the friction force itself may be directed right, its work is negative due to its opposing nature. Ultimately, understanding the sign convention is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
sphyics
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
Frictional force-- sign convention

For a horizontal spring mass system is the frictional force considered negative (-μmg)? i guess it will be negative; the minus sign used to convey the force is trying to impede the motion of block then with that guessing work; i think friction force will be always negative for a horizontal spring mass system. If I'm wrong please correct me :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


IN a horizontal system, "+" usually means "to the right", and "-" means "to the left." Is your frictional force to the right or to the left?
 


jtbell said:
IN a horizontal system, "+" usually means "to the right", and "-" means "to the left." Is your frictional force to the right or to the left?

Appreciate your reply :)

The frictional force is to the right; the case under consideration is: when the mass is stretched to the extreme right and let it go, as the mass moves towards the left under spring action, the friction force will try to impede the motion hence to the right.. But while deriving the work energy theorem for the particular case the friction force is taken as negative.. hence I'm confused!
 


Work is positive when the force is in the direction of motion (both + or both - in the case of one-dimensional motion) and negative when the force is opposite the direction of motion (one + and the other -).
 


GOT IT! i made a mistake while calculation; i mistook force as +ve and negative whereas i was supposed to take the work due to frictional force negative :)

Thanks for your time jtbell. :) Really appreciate your help. :)
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top