From the Schrödinger equation to the wavepacket reduction axiom

lalbatros
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
2
In the very first pages of "Quantum Mechanics" by Landau & Lifchitz, the measurement process is described as an interaction between a quantum system and a "classical" system.

I like this interpretation since any further evolution of the quantum system is anyway entangled with the "classical" system.
I think it is quite plausible that this evolution as described by the SE, would agree to the evolution as postulated from the famous wavepacket "reduction axiom". (maybe by assuming further that "classical" means a very dense energy spectrum)

Have some of you seen some proofs or some models that details/discuss this point of view?

Thanks, Michel
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lalbatros said:
In the very first pages of "Quantum Mechanics" by Landau & Lifchitz, the measurement process is described as an interaction between a quantum system and a "classical" system.
I don't have the book but I have read a paper which does not agree with that exact interpretation because the whole universe is a quantum system and all interactions are quantum interactions.
However your remark about energy level density seems to be a reasonable way to view some interactions. For me measurement often involves some kind of amplification. Thus in a Geiger counter, photomultiplier tube or dot transistor, a single particle triggers the release of a large number of particles. While quantum rules still apply, the number of particles and energy are so large that we can ignore quantum and use classical rules which fortunately are much simpler.
 
lalbatros said:
Have some of you seen some proofs or some models that details/discuss this point of view?

Thanks, Michel


See decoherence program (google or arxiv). see for example quant-ph\0312059.

Seratend.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top