General Harmonic Oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of measuring an energy greater than 2(hbar)ω for a particle in a harmonic oscillator potential, given its initial wave function. The user identifies that the relevant energy levels correspond to n > 2, where the energy is calculated using the formula En = (n + 1/2)(hbar)ω. They express the probability as P(E>2(hbar)ω) = 1 - P(E≤2(hbar)ω), needing clarification on the wave function ψ. Ultimately, the user indicates that the problem has been resolved and requests to disregard the post.
helpppmeee
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Edit: Problem solved please disregard this post

Homework Statement


A particle in the harmonic oscillator potential has the initial wave function \Psi(x, 0) = ∑(from n = 0 to infinity) Cnψn(x) where the ψ(x) are the (normalized) harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions and the coefficients are given by the expression Cn = 1/(√(2^(n=1))). What is the probability that a measurement of the oscillator's energy at an arbitrary time t>0 will yield a result greater than 2(hbar)ω.

Homework Equations


En = (n + 1/2)(hbar)ω

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe I can attempt the answer. The P(E>2(hbar)ω) is when En = 2(hbar)ω so ∴, n > 2 is when En = 2(hbar)ω. So, from 2 to infinite integers, we have the potential energies according to the equation \Psi(x, 0) = ∑(from n = 0 to infinity) Cnψn(x). So therefore, I believe that the integral of (\Psi(x, 0))^2 will give me my probability of finding the energy. So therefore, P(E>2(hbar)ω) = 1 - P(E≤2(hbar)ω) where P(E≤2(hbar)ω) = C1ψ1 + C0ψ0. I just can't seem to figure out what ψ is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Really? nobody can help?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top