General solution for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation

Dyatlov
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
Hello! I have two uncertainties (hehe) about two concepts from a QM time-dependent Schrödinger equation video.
The video is
I cannot move on further if I don't fully grasp everything he explains in the video. My two issues are:
1) The general solution for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation starts at 55:20.He uses αi for a set of coefficients of states. What exactly are these? the probability densities? probability amplitudes? the absolute probabilities? He mentions any state vector can be written as a superposition of eigenvectors of the energy, so α should be a probability amplitude, so you can calculate it's squared modulus.
2) At 1:03:04 he comes up with the exponential solution e^-iEjt. Where exactly from does he gets α(0) from?
Appreciating any kind of answer which would help me shed some light on these two things. Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Usually one calls the square modulus of ##\alpha## as the probability amplitude.
2) Didn't he say that he assumes he knows the wavefunction at t=0, and hence the corresponding expansion coefficients?
 
Last edited:
blue_leaf77 said:
1) Usually one calls the square modulus of ##\alpha## as the probability amplitude.
2) Didn't he say that he assumes he knows the wavefunction at t=0, and hence the corresponding expansion coefficients?
Thanks for the reply.
1) Fair enough but my question was what does α stand for (he calls it coefficient of states).
 
If your problem is simply being confused as what to call ##\alpha##, you can also adopt what he said in the video. I personally would call it expansion coefficient, the way to obtain it is through the equation ##\alpha_i(t) = \langle i | e^{-iHt/\hbar} | \psi(0) \rangle ##. I guess you know about it already.
 
Dyatlov said:
Hello! I have two uncertainties (hehe) about two concepts from a QM time-dependent Schrödinger equation video.
The video is
I cannot move on further if I don't fully grasp everything he explains in the video. My two issues are:
1) The general solution for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation starts at 55:20.He uses αi for a set of coefficients of states. What exactly are these? the probability densities? probability amplitudes? the absolute probabilities? He mentions any state vector can be written as a superposition of eigenvectors of the energy, so α should be a probability amplitude, so you can calculate it's squared modulus.
2) At 1:03:04 he comes up with the exponential solution e^-iEjt. Where exactly from does he gets α(0) from?
Appreciating any kind of answer which would help me shed some light on these two things. Cheers!


When we write |\Psi(t) \rangle = \sum_{n} a_{n}(t) |n\rangle , \ \ \ \ a_{n}(t) = \langle n|\Psi(t)\rangle we are simply representing the abstract state vector |\Psi\rangle by a set of numbers a_{n} which have all the information content in the state Psi. You should know that from vector algebra. Recall the similarity with the vector relations \vec{V}=\sum_{i} v_{i} \hat{e}_{i}, \ \ \ \ v_{i} = \hat{e}_{j} \cdot \vec{V} . So, you say that a_{n}(t) are the components of the “vector” |\Psi\rangle in the |n\rangle “direction”, projection of |\Psi\rangle on |n\rangle, how much of the state |n\rangle one can find in the state |\Psi\rangle, transition (or probability) amplitude from |\Psi\rangle to |n\rangle, or (even better) matrix representation of the state vector |\Psi\rangle. Notice that in a_{n}-representation, the Schrodinger equation becomes i \frac{d}{d t} \langle m | \Psi \rangle = \sum_{n} \langle m |H| n \rangle \ a_{n}(t) , or i \frac{d a_{m}}{d t} = \sum_{n} H_{m n} \ a_{n}(t) . This was the starting equation of the so-called Matrix Mechanics of Heisenberg. It is just an equivalent, matrix form of the differential equation of Schrodinger. Now, suppose that |n\rangle form eigen-states of the Hamiltonian, H|n\rangle = E_{n}|n\rangle, then H_{m n} = \langle m | H | n \rangle = E_{n} \delta_{n m} , and the above matrix equation becomes (no sum on m) i \frac{d a_{m}(t)}{d t} = E_{m} a_{m}(t) . Integrating this from t=0 to t, we find \int_{t=0}^{t} \frac{d a_{m}(t)}{a_{m}(t)} = - i E_{m} \int_{0}^{t} dt ,\ln |\frac{a_{m}(t)}{a_{m}(0)}| = - i E_{m} t , which we normally write as a_{m}(t) = a_{m}(0) e^{ - i E_{m} t}.
 
  • Like
Likes ShayanJ and vanhees71
Thanks a lot, that helped.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top