Geometrical problem related to thin film interference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the optical path length difference in thin film interference, specifically the equation Δ=n(BC+CD)-BE=2nd cos(r). The poster is struggling to derive the term 2nd cos(r) and has attempted trigonometric methods without success. They clarify that this inquiry is independent of their coursework and is aimed at understanding the concept of thin film interference under non-perpendicular incidence. Visual aids are provided to assist in the explanation. The thread highlights the challenges of applying trigonometry to this optical problem.
khaos89
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Look at the picture below, I have to prove that the optical path length difference is

\Delta=n(BC+CD)-BE=2nd\cos(r)

[PLAIN]http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/2271/schermata082455775alle1.th.png

The problem is just how to get 2nd\cos(r)

I actually don't have any idea :\

I have tried to work with trigonometry but no luck yet...

(I am posting it here because it's not related to course work, i am just trying to understand how it works when we don't have perpendicular incidence)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sorry, here we go with the pic:

[PLAIN]http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/2271/schermata082455775alle1.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a lot :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top