Given a Hamiltonian how do you pick the most convenient Hilbert space?

golnat
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For example, I have a 3D particle that experiences a harmonic oscillator potential only in the X,Y plane for all Z ie. a free particle in the Z direction. This seems like cylindrical coordinates but I'm not sure how to express the Hilbert space if I want to be able to describe states and eigenvalues.

H = (Px^2 + Py^2 + Pz^2) / (2m) + 1/2*mω^2(x^2+y^2)

I know that the energies will be characterized by the two harmonic oscillator dimension quantum numbers and also by the momentum in the z-direction, but what is the formal way to describe the Hilbert space?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In ordinary QM (as opposed to QFT) all Hilbert spaces are equivalent, so you don't have to care.
Maybe you mean the range of definition?
 
I'm studying for my preliminary exam for grad school, and I have a practice problem that gives this Hamiltonian. The first part asks about the symmetries of the hamiltonian. I said energy, angular momentum about the z-axis and linear momentum in the z-direction. The next part asks, "Describe the most convenient Hilbert space to use for describing states and eigenvalues of this system, and describe why."
 
Technically the existing symmetries (such as space-time ones) would help you get a suitable Hilbert space starting from L^(R^n), n = dof. For the uniparticle Hamiltonian in post #1, the Hilbert space would be L^2((0,r),dr) X {e^(im\phi) | m in Z} X L^2 (R,dz).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top