Given two charges where to put thrid charge for zero net force

AI Thread Summary
To achieve zero net force on a third charge, q3, placed between two charges, q1 and q2, the relative signs of the charges must be considered. When q1 and q2 have the same sign, q3 must be positioned between them, leading to the equation x = [(q1 (+or-) sqrt(q1q2))/(q1-q2)]*r. However, if q1 equals q2, this approach fails, suggesting a need for a different method, such as checking for x = r/2. In cases where q1 and q2 have opposite signs, the equation becomes x = [(q1 (+or-) sqrt(-q1q2))/(q1+q2)]*r, which accurately reflects the behavior of the system. The discussion highlights the importance of considering charge signs and the implications for the placement of q3.
msbell1
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two charges, q1 and q2, are separated by a distance r. Find the position at which a third charge, q3, can be placed so that the net electrostatic force on it is zero.


Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law:
F = (kq1q2)/r122 * (r12hat)


The Attempt at a Solution


I was trying to solve this for the general case, without making any assumptions about the relative signs of q1 and q2. However, this kind of turns into a mess (for me at least), so I changed my strategy. I now consider two cases. One is where q1q2>0 (they have the same sign. In this case, I know that q3 will have to be placed somewhere between q1 and q2. This gives me (after assigning q1 to the origin, and q2 to x=r, and placing q3 at position x),

(kq1q3)/x^2 = (kq2q3)/(r-x)^2

Solving this for x, I find:
x = [(q1 (+or-) sqrt(q1q2))/(q1-q2)]*r

This looks kind of ok, except, what happens when q1=q2? That doesn't make any sense. It would look better if it was (q1+q2) in the denominator. Then I thought maybe I messed up a sign in my original equation, so I tried

(kq1q3)/x^2 = -(kq2q3)/(r-x)^2

(I just put a minus sign in front of the term on the RHS.) This equation actually seems like it should be appropriate when q1q2<0 (the have opposite signs). Solving this gives:

x = [(q1 (+or-) sqrt(-q1q2))/(q1+q2)]r,

and this equation has perfect behavior for the case where it is valid, when q1q2<0.

Can anyone see what I did wrong in the first solution? I know if q1=q2 I should get x=r/2, not x=∞. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(kq1q3)/x^2 = (kq2q3)/(r-x)^2 [1]

Solving this for x, I find:
x = [(q1 (+or-) sqrt(q1q2))/(q1-q2)]*r [2]
I like this part.
In the middle step when you cross multiply and put in the form ax² + bx + c = 0
you can see that when q1 = q2, it is not a quadratic so for that case you would have to do something other than [2] to solve it. Check to see if it works out to x = r/2.
Maybe it works for q1 and q2 having opposite signs, too.
 
Thank you very much! I see that now! If I try this when q2 = -q1, I find
x = [(1 (+or-) sqrt(-1))/2]*r. Since this is imaginary, I guess this indicates that there is no solution between q1 and q2 when their signs are opposite, which is true.
 
Most welcome! Did you try q1 = 4, q2 = -1, q3 = 1? That should show if it works for q3 to the right of q2.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top