Gravitation: Force inside a sphere

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the gravitational force from a solid sphere on a small object, the mass inside the sphere must be determined based on its density and radius. For an object located 1.1 m from the center, only the mass within that radius contributes to the gravitational force, while for an object at 3.3 m, the entire mass of the sphere is considered. The gravitational force can be simplified by treating the sphere's mass as concentrated at its center, leveraging symmetry principles. The net gravitational force inside a hollow sphere is zero due to the cancellation of forces from opposite mass sections. Understanding these principles simplifies the calculations for gravitational effects both inside and outside the sphere.
Rockdog
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
A solid sphere has a uniform density, a mass of 17 kg and a radius of 2.2 m.
=============
a) What is the force due to gravity from the sphere on a very small object of mass 21 grams located 1.1 m from its center?

b) What is the force due to gravity from the sphere on a very small object of mass 21 grams located 3.3 m from its center?

How do I start this problem? I know that F=G*m1*m2/R
and Mass inside a shell= density*(4/3)pi*r^3, but it just confuses me more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you determine the net force of gravity on an object inside a spherical shell, and outside a spherical shell. You might find it in your textbook. It will make your life a lot easier.
 
The quick way of solving it is to use the fact that if you have a sphere of radius r1 and an object inside at distance r2 (r2<r1) from the center of the sphere then only matter at distance x<r2 from the center would give a net gravitational effect. All other effects cancel each other because of the symmetry (I'm assuming, of course, that everything stands still).

The good way to do it is to proove the above "fact", for example by adding up all contributions (integral).

regards,
radu
http://www.geocities.com/_rgrig
http://rgrig.blogspot.com/
 
One can show that the net gravitational force on an object inside a hollow sphere is 0. That's because the pull due to a small section of mass is exactly offset by the pull of the mass opposite the first section.

One can also show, by symmetry, that the gravitational force, due to a spherical mass, on an object outside the sphere is exactly the same as if the mass were concentrated at the center of the sphere.

To answer the first question, use the density to calculate the mass of the portion of the sphere inside radius 1.1 m and treat it as a mass concentrated at the center.

To answer the second, treat the entire 17 kg as if it were concentrated at the center.
 
Sorry, can you explain something first.
First part, I figured out the density value to calculate the mass of the portion of the sphere inside radius 1.1 m. Now you say treat it as a concentrated mass at the center of the sphere. Ok, but I mean, what do I do with it in terms of calculation?

2) Can you explain why its the entire 17kg?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top