B Gravitational acceleration in circular motion

AI Thread Summary
In uniform circular motion, the acceleration of 9.8 m/s², which represents gravitational acceleration, does not disappear but is instead balanced by centripetal acceleration. The centripetal acceleration, calculated as a = v²/r, is responsible for changing the direction of the velocity vector without altering its magnitude. The discussion clarifies that acceleration affects velocity, not speed, which remains constant in uniform circular motion. The concept of a conical pendulum is also mentioned as a related topic that involves both gravitational and centripetal forces. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the principles of motion in circular paths.
physicsmagician
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hi guys, I have a question that is simple but I do not know how to answer that. It is the following, where does the acceleration of 9,8 meters per second squared go when We're dealing with uniform circular motion? I know that We have the centripetal acceleration that is a vector change, but the value of 9,8 I said, where did it go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a=\frac{v^2}{r}
You should set values of speed v and radius r to get a=9.8 m/sec^2.

If you are talking on sum of gravity force or acceleration and centrifugal force or acceleration, Conical pendulum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conical_pendulum might be of your interest.

 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes physicsmagician
What do you mean "where does it go"? Are you asking why the speed doesn't change? If so, the point is that acceleration doesn't change speed, it changes velocity. In the particular case of circular motion it happens not to change the magnitude of the vector, that's all.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes physicsmagician and vanhees71
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top