Gravitational Acceleration Problem

AI Thread Summary
A 95 kg man exerts a force of 1000 N on a scale in a stationary elevator, prompting a calculation of his acceleration. Using Newton's second law, the net force must consider both the upward force from the scale and the downward force of gravity. The correct equation is F(normal) - F(gravity) = ma, leading to a net force of 69 N upward. This results in an acceleration of approximately 0.73 m/s², which is significantly less than Earth's gravitational acceleration of 9.8 m/s². The discussion highlights the importance of accounting for all forces when calculating acceleration.
BandGeek13
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 95 kg man jumps, therefore exerting a force of 1000 N on a bathroom scale. The scale is in a motionless elevator in Earth's gravity. What is the man's acceleration?


Homework Equations


Newton's 2nd Law: F=ma
Possibly Fg=mg ?


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried just using F=ma.
therefore, it'd be:
1000 N=(95kg)(a)
a=10 m/s^2

But this does not take into consideration the Earth's gravity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

"F=ma" uses the net force (vector sum of all forces acting on the man)

Your F uses the 1000N force that the scale exerts on the man. As you suspect, you need to add the force due to Earth's gravity. Just take the vector sum of the scale force and the force due to gravity.
 
So would it be:

F(normal)-F(gravity)=ma
F(normal) - mg=ma
1000 N [up] - (95 kg)(9.8 N/kg [down])=(95 kg)(a)
1000 N [up] - 931 N [down] = (95 kg)(a)
69 N [up] = (95 kg)(a)
0.73 m/s^2 = a

This seems very low..
 
wait!

instead of:
69 N [up] = (95 kg)(a)
0.73 m/s^2 = a

is it:
1931 N [up] = (95 kg)(a)
20. m/s^2 = a
 
BandGeek13 said:
So would it be:
.
.
.
0.73 m/s^2 = a

This seems very low..

Looks good to me.

Note, the man's weight is about 930 N, so the scale would read 930 N when a=0.

The scale reading of 1000N is not much more than this, so expect a to be considerably less than g=9.8 m/s^2.

An acceleration of g=9.8 m/s^2 upward would require a scale reading of 2*930N, which would give Fnet = +930 N upward.

EDIT:
BandGeek13 said:
wait!
.
.
.
is it:
1931 N [up] = (95 kg)(a)
20. m/s^2 = a

Nope. We have +1000N (upward) and -931N (downward), for Fnet=31N upward
 
Alright.
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top