Gravitational force from a square plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational force from a square plate, comparing it to previous calculations involving spheres, rings, and circular plates. The initial approach suggests treating the plate like a wire, but a participant corrects the mass element expression to reflect the area rather than a linear approximation. The conversation emphasizes using double integrals to account for the gravitational effects across the plate's surface, with specific integrals proposed for evaluation. Participants suggest breaking the square into segments for easier calculations and recommend using software tools for complex integrals. The thread highlights the challenges of applying gravitational concepts to non-symmetrical shapes like a square plate.
Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1
I ordinarily would put this up in a homework/ coursework forum, but this isn't either one, its just something I was curious about given that I am in a Mechanics class.

So, I have done calculations for finding the gravitational force from a sphere and from a ring, and a flat circular plate. All these are symmetrical, tho. I was thinking about what happens with a square plate.

Now, here's the thing. Let's put our particle at a distance z from the surface of the plate. We wil put it in the center, to make the forces as symmetrical as possible.

Kind of intuitively, I would say that the way to do that calculation is to pretend you are dealing with a wire, (kind of like what you do calculating the electrical fields with a square wire). But this is a plate, so it's different (I think).

We have the mass of the plate. At any "radius" b from the center, if the plate is density ρ, with a side of "a" units, the mass is going to be 2b^2ρ. So I thought we could have a dM = 4bρ.

That wold say to me that th eintegral would look like this: \int dF_z = \int_0^a \frac{mG4d\rho dM}{s^2} where s^2 is the distance to that dM, and that will be \sqrt{b^2+z^2} so the integral would end up as: \int dF_z = mG\rho \int_0^a \frac{4b db}{\sqrt{b^2+z^2}}

but anyway, I'd be curios to know if I am approaching this right. I was thinking of the old science fiction tropes with these huge space stations, and wondering what wold happen if one was constructed as a plane square -- also Stephen Baxter -- a scientist himself -- wrote a novel called Raft which takes place in a universe where gravitational forces are a billion times stronger, and a rat of metal plates actually has enough "pull" to live on. (there's more to it than that, but y'all get the idea).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to go out on a limb on this one and put out what I got after quickly doing it out on paper. I didn't actually check the integral, so I'm not sure it's 100% right.

You have the wrong expression for ##dm##, it should be ##dm=\rho dA = \rho dx dy##.

I think this problem is easier to work out by not treating it as a bunch of lines.

I think the integral should be $$Gm\rho \int ^{b/2}_{-b/2} \int ^{b/2}_{-b/2} \frac{dxdy}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)} cos\theta= Gm\rho z \int ^{b/2}_{-b/2} \int ^{b/2}_{-b/2} \frac{dxdy}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}} $$

I think this makes sense because $$dF = \frac{Gm\rho dA}{r^2}cos\theta$$

Don't take my word for it though, you should evaluate it and check to see if it makes sense.
 
There are fairly simple expressions for the field and potential of a charged rod, in its midplane. See http://www.lightandmatter.com/area1sn.html , section 10.3.1. I would try breaking up the square into parallel line segments, taking the expression for the potential and integrating it. The integral would probably be ugly, but you could put it into software such as maxima (which is free and open source).
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Back
Top