Gravitational redshift and black holes

niin
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Questions: Gravitational redshift and black holes

I have some questions:

1. What does gravitational redshift do to light trying to escape a black hole? Is the light destroyed?

2. And what is the physical cause of this redshift? (I’m not interested in equations and math, only the physical cause).

I hope someone can help me. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The beginning to understand gravitational redshift is the Equivalence Principle.

"In a local inertial frame the laws of physics are given by the laws of special relativity"

Now we have to reference frames S1 and S2, S1 situated at some distance above S2.
They are in a gravitational field.
S1 will always remain still and S2 will start free falling at t=0.

At t=0 we emit a photon from the origin to S2 towards S1.

... this continues but some math are required.

you can work out the frequency that S1 will receive if you use the weak field approximation.
 
Kuon,
I don't see why the "equivalence principle" should solve it. If you think of the first reference frame as being accelerated, then there is no redshift, because both reference frame must be accelerated or the distance would change between them. And it's not the distance that changes in this case. Right?
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Back
Top