Greater than 100 percent yield (102%)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around achieving a percent yield greater than 100% in a series of chemical reactions involving copper and various reagents. Possible sources of error include residual aqueous solutions like ZnSO4 and NaNO3, which may not have been completely removed during the drying process. The use of methanol and acetone washes before weighing the copper could also contribute to inaccuracies if methanol remained. Additionally, contamination with solid zinc is suggested as a potential reason for the unexpectedly high yield. The conversation highlights the complexities of measuring yield accurately in chemical experiments.
biochem850
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Cu(s) + 4 HNO3 (aq) Cu(NO3)2 (aq) + 2 NO2 (g) + 2 H2O (l)
Cu(No3)2 + 2NaOH -------> Cu(OH)2 + 2NaNO3
Cu(OH)2→CuO + H2O
CuO + H2SO4 -> H2O + CuSO4
CuSO4(aq) + Zn ( s) ------- ZnSO4 (aq)+ Cu(s)

I carried out the follow reactions using copper as an inital product and my percent yield was higher than 100% but I've got some possible error sources. The aqueous solutions which could have possibly remained due to poor decantation are ZnSO4 and NaNO3 and because these substances have high boiling point, they would not be removed when drying the copper using a steam bath and their masses would have an effect? I feel that this is unlikely because we used four washes in which zinc sulfate and sodium nitrate are soluble.

We used methanol and acetone washes right beofre drying the copper and perhaps methanol remained when weighing (because acetone is more volatile)?

In addition, would the highest possible percent error be 2%?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which product are you asking for?
 
AGNuke said:
Which product are you asking for?

Copper
 
There is no such thing as the "highest possible percent error" - error is proportional to the experimentalist clumsiness, and unlimited :wink:

My bet is that your copper is contaminated with solid zinc. Hard to tell not knowing the complete procedure you followed.
 
Probably Copper is just made a thin layer of precipitation on Zinc piece. Try using finely divided Zinc dust.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top