- #106
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2023 Award
- 35,005
- 21,672
The fact that a committee has to call itself a "truth committee" already makes me suspicious they have an axe to grind.
First, nobody goes out and picks an interest rate. The lender picks the rate, and its determined by how risky the borrower was. Greek debt was assessed to be risky. And, to quote Clevon Little, "And they was right!"
Second, Greece spends 2.2% on defense. By treaty, this can go no lower than 2%. So we have 0.2% of wiggle room, compared to 16.7% on pensions. It's surely not the primary problem.
Third, I don't think anyone doubts that Greece was lent too much in the past. Certainly not the people who lent them money and never saw it again. But the solution surely isn't "lend us more money" or even "let us not pay back what we have already borrowed, and then lend us more money".
Finally, an insolvent Greek government does not have to leave the EU or even the euro. They might want to, and there might even be good reason to, but they don't have to.
First, nobody goes out and picks an interest rate. The lender picks the rate, and its determined by how risky the borrower was. Greek debt was assessed to be risky. And, to quote Clevon Little, "And they was right!"
Second, Greece spends 2.2% on defense. By treaty, this can go no lower than 2%. So we have 0.2% of wiggle room, compared to 16.7% on pensions. It's surely not the primary problem.
Third, I don't think anyone doubts that Greece was lent too much in the past. Certainly not the people who lent them money and never saw it again. But the solution surely isn't "lend us more money" or even "let us not pay back what we have already borrowed, and then lend us more money".
Finally, an insolvent Greek government does not have to leave the EU or even the euro. They might want to, and there might even be good reason to, but they don't have to.