Gross-Pitaevskii equation in Bose Einstein condensates

alexvas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was hoping someone might be able to give a approachable explination of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. All the sources I've been able to find seem to concentrate on the derivation, and I don't have the physics background to follow. From what I understand, however, is that the GP equation models the ground state of a collection of bosons (all in the same, lowest energy state) by using "some mean field theory approach". My main questions are

1) What are some of the assumptions that lead to the GP equation?
2) I've read that the GP is 'a nonlinear Schrodinger equation'. I recognize the form of the Schrodinger equation in the GP, but is the extra magnitude-of-psi-squared term part of the potential or something completely different? Intuitively, where does it come from and what does it mean?
3) What are some interesting and/or physically relevant potentials for the GP equation? I guess this is a vague question, but what kinds of potentials are Bose Einstein condensates frequently subjected to? For instance, in quantum mechanics we study the particle in a box and harmonic oscillator models - are these interesting/relevant in BE condensates as well?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ad 1) Only the interaction of the particles in the low density-low energy region is relevant. This interaction can be described in terms of the scattering length a.
This interaction can be approximated by a delta function like potential.
ad 2) Yes, the nonlinear psi squared term is part of the potential, namely of the particle-particle repulsion. Besides this, there is the external potential e.g. of the trap.
ad 3) The first traps corresponded to more or less harmonical external potentials.
Nowadays, very complex confining potentials can be realized, e.g. potential lattices.
 
Thanks for the response. I'd appreciate some clarification, if possible:

1) Why is the interaction of particles in low-density energy regions the only important interaction? Aren't (ideally) all the bosons in the same state, so all of the interactions are occurring at the ground state (which has a high density)? Or am I misunderstanding what you mean by "density-low energy region"? Does modeling the interaction as a delta function mean that individual bosons don't interact with anything but themselves?

2) Does particle repulsion scale as psi(x)^2 because it's a function of boson density? The expression for this repulsion seems a little too simple - shouldn't it have some kind of mean-field component?

3) Potential lattices are basically just plane waves, correct? What happens to bosons in such a potential? Can this be a stationary state of the bosons?

Thanks!
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top