Hamiltonian of charged particle

In summary, the Hamiltonian of a charged particle of mass m attracted by a central force with magnitude F = \frac{k}{r^2} can be found by using the potential and Lagrangian equations. The Hamiltonian is given by H(r, \theta, \dot{r}, \dot{\theta}) = \frac{1}{2} \frac{p_r^2}{m} + \frac{1}{2} \frac{p_\theta^2}{mr^2} - \frac{k}{r}. The sign of the potential, U, must be corrected for accuracy. This problem can be further explored by considering the Hamiltonian for charges and fields in the full electromagnetic theory.
  • #1
Mindscrape
1,861
1
A charged particle of mass m is attracted by a central force with magnitude [tex] F = \frac{k}{r^2} [/tex]. Find the Hamiltonian of the particle.

I'm just wondering if I did this correctly because it seemed too easy. First I used the fact that -dU/dr = F = k/r^2, so the potential (with infinite boundary) is given by
[tex] U(r) = \frac{-k}{r} [/tex]

Then using plane polar coordinates the Legrangian will be
[tex]L = T - U = \frac{1}{2} m (\dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta}^2) + \frac{k}{r}[/tex]

The general momenta will be given by
[tex] \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}} = p_r = m \dot{r}/[tex]
and
[tex] \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}}= p_\theta = mr^2 \dot{\theta}[/tex]

Putting the momenta in terms of the dots of the generalized coordinates
[tex] \dot{r} = \frac{p_r}{m}[/tex]
and
[tex] \dot{\theta} = \frac{p_\theta}{mr^2}[/tex]

So the Hamiltonian will be
[tex]H(q_k, p_k) = \sum_j p_j \dot{q}_j - L(q_k, \dot{q}_k)[/tex]
i.e.
[tex]H(r, \theta, \dot{r}, \dot{\theta}) = \frac{p_r^2}{m} + \frac{p_\theta^2}{mr^2} - \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta}^2) - \frac{k}{r}[/tex]
and with the momenta equations
[tex]H(r, \theta, \dot{r}, \dot{\theta}) = \frac{p_r^2}{m} + \frac{p_\theta^2}{mr^2} - \frac{1}{2}m((\frac{p_r}{m})^2 + r^2 (\frac{p_\theta}{mr^2})^2) - \frac{k}{r}[/tex]

simplified this will give the familiar H = T + U
[tex]H(r, \theta, \dot{r}, \dot{\theta}) = \frac{1}{2} \frac{p_r^2}{m} + \frac{1}{2} \frac{p_\theta^2}{mr^2} - \frac{k}{r}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
looks ok
if it is too easy, have look at the hamiltonian for charges and fields in the full EM theory, could be a bit more challenging and interresting
 
  • #3
You got the sign of U wrong.
 

FAQ: Hamiltonian of charged particle

What is the Hamiltonian of a charged particle?

The Hamiltonian of a charged particle is a mathematical operator that describes the total energy of the particle in a given system. It takes into account the particle's kinetic energy, potential energy, and any external forces acting on the particle.

How is the Hamiltonian of a charged particle different from the Hamiltonian of a neutral particle?

The Hamiltonian of a charged particle includes an additional term for the particle's interaction with electromagnetic fields, while the Hamiltonian of a neutral particle does not have this term. This is because charged particles experience a force in the presence of electromagnetic fields, while neutral particles do not.

How is the Hamiltonian of a charged particle used in quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian of a charged particle is used to calculate the particle's energy levels and corresponding wavefunctions. It is an essential component in solving the Schrödinger equation, which describes the time evolution of quantum systems.

Can the Hamiltonian of a charged particle change over time?

Yes, the Hamiltonian of a charged particle can change over time if there are external forces acting on the particle or if the particle is in a time-varying electromagnetic field. In this case, the Hamiltonian is a function of time and must be taken into account when solving for the particle's dynamics.

How does the Hamiltonian of a charged particle relate to classical mechanics?

In classical mechanics, the Hamiltonian of a charged particle is equivalent to the total energy of the particle. However, in quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian also includes the particle's potential energy and interactions with electromagnetic fields, making it a more comprehensive operator for describing the particle's behavior.

Back
Top