Has Anyone Else Discovered the G Dimensional Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the G Dimensional Theory, with participants sharing their initial encounters and opinions about its validity. Some view it as a "crank theory," while others find it innovative and worthy of exploration. There is a notable emphasis on the need for clearer definitions of key concepts, such as "paradox" and the parameters of the theory. The theory contrasts with Einstein's General Relativity by suggesting a different approach to gravitational effects on space. Overall, the conversation reflects a mix of skepticism and curiosity regarding this new theoretical framework.
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's a crank theory.
 
I think it is not a crank theory. Why does everoyne say that about new theories?
I think its very innovative. But I think (in the essay) the author should briefly define paradox.
 
Gravitational compression of space is the inverse of Einstein's premise of expanded Space in a gravity well. A clear distinction therefore exists between G-D Theory and General Relativity[Quote/]

Very sane views. I agree. He has chosen for our universe same type of infinity, what I offer too. However in questions about spatial dimensions our glances are not coincided.
 
Riiiiight.

He'll have to define his parameters much better.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Assume that this is a case where by sheer coincidence, two sources of coherent single-frequency EM wave pulses with equal duration are both fired in opposing directions, with both carrying the same frequency and amplitude and orientation. These two waves meet head-on while moving in opposing directions, and their phases are precisely offset by 180 degrees so that each trough of one wave meets with the crest of the other. This should be true for both the electric and magnetic components of...

Similar threads

Back
Top