Have Any Conjectures in the Random Matrix Model Been Proven or Disproven?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Model Random
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Is any of the conjectures in:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9610043v3.pdf

have been proven/disproven? what has been left still open?

I am thinking of reading this article sometime in the future, hope it's digestable (but first need to finish my studies of QFT and GR.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Anyone?

As far as I know it is based on SUSY as premesis. This is my problem too. We have 3 stringtheorys transformed in S Matrix so far. This is working well. But I think full M Theory is far from it. I'm not skilled enough to interpretate this paper and if we really have a "downgrade" for the M Theory, then we would hear about it on TV and all newspapers.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
this thread is to open up discussion on Gravi-GUT as theories of everything GUT or Grand Unified Theories attempt to unify the 3 forces of weak E&M and strong force, and Gravi-GUT want to add gravity. this peer reviewed paper in a journal on Gravi-GUT Chirality in unified theories of gravity F. Nesti1 and R. Percacci2 Phys. Rev. D 81, 025010 – Published 14 January, 2010 published by Physical Review D this paper is cited by another more recent Gravi-GUT these papers and research...
In LQG and LQC there are solutions called "black to white transition". I'll add some references: (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07251 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03872 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06330 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04264 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12823 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02691 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07589 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01788 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12646 https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03027...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
50
Views
9K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Back
Top