Have Any Conjectures in the Random Matrix Model Been Proven or Disproven?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Model Random
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Is any of the conjectures in:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9610043v3.pdf

have been proven/disproven? what has been left still open?

I am thinking of reading this article sometime in the future, hope it's digestable (but first need to finish my studies of QFT and GR.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Anyone?

As far as I know it is based on SUSY as premesis. This is my problem too. We have 3 stringtheorys transformed in S Matrix so far. This is working well. But I think full M Theory is far from it. I'm not skilled enough to interpretate this paper and if we really have a "downgrade" for the M Theory, then we would hear about it on TV and all newspapers.
 

Thread 'The "electroweak eta meson"'

This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
View full post »

Thread 'Black to white transition in LQC'

In LQG and LQC there are solutions called "black to white transition". I'll add some references: (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07251 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03872 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06330 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04264 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12823 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02691 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07589 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01788 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12646 https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03027...
View full post »

Thread 'Discussion of "Two-Time Physics" (I. Bars) and its potential cosmological implications'

Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Some questions about Coleman's Baby Universe model
Replies
1
Views
3K
A The Exceptional Jordan Algebra in physics
Replies
3
Views
3K
I A novel explanation of CKM and PMNS matrix parameters
Replies
2
Views
2K
I How credible are CKM matrix limits on new physics?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Status of String Random Matrix Models w/ c>1
Replies
1
Views
3K
CC Problem Beyond the Standard Model
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Updates on the experiments X17
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
I The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
Replies
26
Views
5K
I Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
Replies
15
Views
5K
Matrix Model for Membranes and D-brane Dynamics
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top