I Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and macroscopic objects

wnvl2
Messages
62
Reaction score
14
Is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) applicable to macroscopic objects? A football, for instance, is composed of an enormous number of particles. Can the applicability of the HUP to a macroscopic object like a football be demonstrated through statistical methods, starting from the behavior of elementary particles? Are there any references or research that support this approach? Alternatively, should the principle be derived directly from the commutation relations between momentum and position, extended to macroscopic objects while accounting for all interactions between their constituent particles?

I understand that macroscopic behavior is generally not sensitive to quantum fluctuations, but I am curious about the theoretical justification and derivation of the HUP at this scale.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wnvl2 said:
Alternatively, should the principle be derived directly from the commutation relations between momentum and position, extended to macroscopic objects while accounting for all interactions between their constituent particles?
The de Broglie wavelength of a macroscopic solid body gives you the uncertainty of its center of mass. You can check that by transforming the system into center of mass and reduced coordinates. This is a linear canonical transformation of the spatial coordinats, and the Schrödinger equation of non-relativistic QM is invariant under those.
 
wnvl2 said:
Is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) applicable to macroscopic objects?
Yes, but you will find it interesting to calculate the uncertainty for a reasonable sized macroscopic object (say, a grain of sand that might have a mass of .1 milligrams).
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top