Rather the second one. Actually it simply says that you start with a state. Acting with an operator on it measures whatever the operator corresponds to (energy, momemntum,position etc) After the measurement the particle is in an eigenstate of that operator(one that corresponds to the eigenvalue you just measured). Now you want a second measurement, so you act with a second operator, different from the first. If the two operators commute, they may have a common set of eigenvectors(i.e. states), so acting on an eigenstate of the second operator with the second operator will measue the eigenvalue of the second operator, but not change the state. If they do not, then you will force the state to CHANGE into an eigenstate of the second operator and after your measurement you know the state and the value of the observable correspoinding to the second operator. But then, you do not know the value of the first, because the state that occurred when you did the first measurement has CHANGED
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation.
It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........
This confused me, sorry.
All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong)
I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity?
Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity?
Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question.
Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition:
https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/
As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA