Help to convert units of a simple formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around converting units in a formula involving the constant H and variable k, with H valued at 10^3 in natural units. Participants confirm that H can be expressed in natural units while keeping k in Hz, but there is confusion about the implications of these conversions. The relationship between GeV and Hz is clarified, indicating that GeV is approximately 10^24 Hz, not 10^-11. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on which natural unit system is being referenced, as multiple systems exist. Ultimately, the participants seek to ensure accurate unit conversions in the context of particle and atomic physics.
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Consider the following formula
Relevant Equations
## p = k^2/ H^2 ##, where k is a variable of units Hz and H is a constant ## H= 10^{14} ## GeV
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units,

According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##,
## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units.

So is this conversion correct?

Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Safinaz said:
Homework Statement: Consider the following formula
Relevant Equations: ## p = k^2/ H^2 ##, where k is a variable of units Hz and H is a constant
I do not see what those have to do with the rest of your question.
Safinaz said:
## H= 10^{14} ## GeV
Safinaz said:
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units,
Don’t those imply GeV=##10^{-11}## in natural units?
Safinaz said:
That link lists six different systems. Which one are you using?

Safinaz said:
## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##,
So it’s particle and atomic physics, right?
Safinaz said:
and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##,
So not ##10^{-11}##?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top