Help with Paradoxical Groups: Vectors, Finite Groups, F3 & Z

  • Thread starter Thread starter JSG31883
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of paradoxical groups in relation to vectors and finite groups. It addresses the existence of a unique transformation C that maps two independent vectors in R2 to another pair of vectors. The definition of a G-paradoxical set is clarified, emphasizing the need for a group action on a set. The conversation also questions the paradoxical nature of specific groups like F3 and Z, while highlighting the ambiguity in the term "not very paradoxical." Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of precise definitions and conditions in understanding paradoxical groups.
JSG31883
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need some serious help in paradoxical groups!

1) Given vectors v1,v2 in R2 and w1,w2 in R2 (none lieing on a line thru the origin), show that you can find a unique C such that Cv1=w1 and Cv2=w2.

2) Show that a finite group is not very paradoxical.

3) Is F3 paradoxical? Is Z?


THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
would you care to define paradoxical?

1 is easy if you pick a basis. , though that is unnecessary, just define a map satisfying such and extend by linaerity to all of R^2 and note that two independent vectors in R^2 are a basis (you mean w1 w2 not lying on the same line, and v1 v2 not lying on the same line).
 
Def of Paradoxical:

G acts on X, E is subset of X.
E is G-paradoxical if there exists pairwise disjoin sets A1, ... , An, B1,..., Bm inside E and g1,...,gn, h1,...,hm inside G with E=(union)(Ai)=(union)(Bj).

If X is metric space and G acts by isometries, and we have A's, B's, g's, and h's as above, we have G-very paradoxical.
 
Last edited:
Why didn't you say it was to help you do an assignment in a rush... my interest has dropped off, sorry. YOu might consider that your definition of paradoxical requres G to act on a set (your examples in the question don't) and you have not given a quantification of "not very" for paradoxical.
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top