Hershel experiment regarding IR radiation

AI Thread Summary
The Hershel experiment demonstrated that red light, despite having lower energy than violet light, can produce a higher temperature reading on a thermometer due to its greater intensity and the strong infrared component in sunlight. Light itself does not have a temperature; rather, the temperature reading depends on the intensity and absorption characteristics of the light interacting with the thermometer. While ultraviolet light has higher energy per photon, its lower intensity in sunlight results in a lesser heating effect compared to red light. The experiment highlights that the notable heating effect occurs even when no visible light is detected. Ultimately, the interaction of light with materials and the specific conditions of the experiment are crucial for understanding temperature readings.
mildpiranha
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have been struggling with the following; (apologies if this is a simple question)

After reading the Hershel experiment where with a prism light was used to split white light into a spectrum of colours and the red light was warmer than the violet light, then he placed a detector past the red and discovered infrared where his detector registered a higher temperature.

My question is why does the red light have a higher temperature than the violet, when the violet light has a higher energy?

Also if he placed a detector past the violet section in the ultraviolet region would he have detected a colder temperature?

Thank you for your help
 
Science news on Phys.org
Light does not have a temperature.

The temperature of the thermometer depends on the light intensity (and the absorption coefficient of the surface). Sunlight has a strong infrared component, the intensity in the ultraviolet range is low (and below a certain wavelength, the prism will just absorb the light).

The energy per photon is larger for ultraviolet light.
 
Thank you for your response.

To clarify does that mean that in the case of this experiment that the red light increased the temperature of the thermometer more than the violet light did as its intensity was greater?

So, if I had equal intensities of red light on one thermometer and violet light on another thermometer would the thermometer which had the violet light on have a greater intensity due to the greater energy of violet light?
 
mildpiranha said:
To clarify does that mean that in the case of this experiment that the red light increased the temperature of the thermometer more than the violet light did as its intensity was greater?
Right.

So, if I had equal intensities of red light on one thermometer and violet light on another thermometer would the thermometer which had the violet light on have a greater intensity due to the greater energy of violet light?
Not in general. Intensity already accounts for this difference, its unit is W/m^2 (power per area). The area of the thermometer stays the same, and the absorbed power determines the temperature reading.

A quantative analysis has to be more careful: The thermometer will always receive light in some wavelength range, where the size of this range depends on the wavelength-dependency of the refractive index of the prism, and the received power depends on this size. Also, not the total intensity hitting the thermometer will get absorbed, and this fraction can depend on the wavelength. But those are technical details - the interesting result of the experiment was the notable heating effect where no light was visible.
 
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...

Similar threads

Back
Top