How Are Dual Vector Components Determined by Basis Vectors?

AI Thread Summary
Dual vectors are determined by their values on basis vectors, which means their components in a given basis are fixed by the basis itself. This leads to confusion about the variability of components, as they seem constant across different bases. The equation mentioned, e^i(e_j) = δ^i_j, is indeed reliant on the choice of basis, and may not apply to all orthonormal bases. The Riesz Representation Theorem allows for expressing functionals as inner products with vectors in the space, reinforcing the connection between dual spaces and their bases. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the nature of dual spaces and their components.
noahcharris
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

So I'm going through a chapter on dual spaces and I came across this:

"A key property of any dual vector ##f## is that it is entirely determined by its values on basis vectors.

## f_i \equiv f(e_i) ##

which we refer to as the components of ##f## in the basis ##{e_i}##, this is justified by

##e^i(e_j) = \delta^i_j## "

-- This doesn't make any sense to me. How are the components of the dual space only dependent on the basis of V? Wouldn't that mean the components are always the same? I thought the whole point of components was that they varied.

Also, is the second equation assuming a cartesian basis? (not sure what the technical term is) Because I can think of some orthonormal bases for which this doesn't hold. i.e. I can think of some orthonormal basis where 'picking off' the ith component does not yield 1.

I'm obviously confused.

Dual spaces in general just confuse me, I understand that the dual space is the set of linear functionals on V, and that they can be represented as 1-forms, but as far as the details go (coordinates and bases of the dual space) I'm completely lost. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Using the Riesz Representation of functionals in an inner-product space, you can express any functional as an inner product with a vector in the space. Implying that you would use the same basis set to express the representation (i.e. vector form).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riesz_representation_theorem
 
RUber said:
Using the Riesz Representation of functionals in an inner-product space, you can express any functional as an inner product with a vector in the space. Implying that you would use the same basis set to express the representation (i.e. vector form).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riesz_representation_theorem

Could you expand what you mean by 'vector form'? Are you talking about a differential form (covector)?
 
The vector form I was referring to is just the ##f_i = f(e_i)## notation you used.
 
  • Like
Likes mattclgn
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.

Similar threads

Back
Top