How Are Spin 1 Particles Represented in Quantum Mechanics?

Simp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I have a question, something that is confusing me.
If a particle of spin 1 is measured to have m=1 along the x direction, would the spinor state just be a column vector with (1,0,0), which would also be the spinor if x was infact z. OR would the spinor be determined by multiplying the Sx matrix by a column vector of (a,b,c,d) and letting this equal the eigenvalue (hbar in this case) muliplied by column vector (a,b,c,d) and working out their values and normalising.?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I would write down the three-dimensional representation of SU(2) and look for the appropriate eigenvectors (which you call spinor states). An m=1 state along x is described by an eigenvector of S_x with eigenvalue 1, right?
 
I am not sure what you mean by SU(2) ?
 
Simp, welcome to PhysicsForums.
However, your thread is in the wrong forum, as this is the Quantum Mechanics forum and not the Physics Homework forum. If you need assistance with your homework problems, may I direct you to the appropriate forum: https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=152
Thank you.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top