How Can Degenerate Perturbation Theory Help Identify Zero Order Eigenstates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hermitian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perturbation
hermitian
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I know that for degenerate states, we need to apply degenerate perturbation theory by looking at the perturbative hamiltonian in the subspace of the degenerate states.

What then if the states still degenerate after we cast them the generate subspace. Is there a way to find the zero order 'good' eigenstate?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I borrow this thread to ask a question that is similar to this one.
What does it mean that an operator has a degenarate spectrum and how can we see that if the operator is represented by a matrix. Thanx a lot and I hope I'm not stepping on anybodys toe by using this thread.
 
Welcome to the forum, hermitian!

I believe you can use any basis you like in the subspace if the perturbation does not lift the degeneracy.

A "degenerate spectrum" means that at least one eigenvalue occurs more than once. This would then also be true of the matrix representing the operator.
 
Avodyne said:
Welcome to the forum, hermitian!

I believe you can use any basis you like in the subspace if the perturbation does not lift the degeneracy.

A "degenerate spectrum" means that at least one eigenvalue occurs more than once. This would then also be true of the matrix representing the operator.

thnx that helped alot. Let me see if I got this right: Eigenvalues are the observables and the eigenvectors are the states of the system. what would degenerate spectrum mean physically.

thnx
 
It would mean that knowing the eigenvalue is not sufficient information to determine the state.
 
thanks Avodyne,

i spend sometime to convince myself that I can use any basis I like in the degenerate subspace...
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top