How can Fourier series formulas be derived without just memorizing them?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving Fourier series formulas rather than simply memorizing them. It explains that these formulas can be understood through the concept of an inner product space, where sine and cosine functions serve as an orthonormal basis. The orthogonality of these functions allows for the coefficients in the series to be calculated using integrals that yield zero for different frequencies. The conversation also highlights that using complex exponentials can simplify the derivation process. Understanding the underlying mathematical principles provides clarity on how Fourier series are constructed.
lukaszh
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,
everywhere I can see this
a_n = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^\pi f(t) \cos(nt)\, dt
b_n = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^\pi f(t) \sin(nt)\, dt
etc... I can't find, how to derive this formulas. I'm really tired and a bit confused of this formulas, because I can't find possible way to derive them. I don't like only formula application, but I want to know, what is that formula about.
Thank you...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you have an "inner product space", that is, an vector space with an inner product defined on it, together with an orthonormal basis, v_1, v_2, ..., that is such that &lt;v_i, v_j&gt;= 0 if i\ne j and &lt;v_i, v_i&gt;= 1 for all i, and want to write v as a linear combination, v= a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ ...+ a_nv_n, then [math]a_i= <v, v_i[/itex]. What you have is a vector space with basis cos(nx), sin(nx) with inner product &lt;f, g&gt;= \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^\pi f(t)g(t)dt which leads to the given formulas.
 
It works because the functions sin(nt) for different values of n are orthogonal to each other, that is,

\int^{\pi}_{-\pi} {\sin(nt) \sin (mt) dt} = 0

for n \ne m, and

\int^{\pi}_{-\pi} {\sin^2(nt) dt} = \pi

Likewise for cosines. Try a few examples if you like. Therefore if you have a function

f(t) = b_1 \sin (t) + b_2 \sin (2t) + b_3 \sin (3t) + ...

then, for example, letting n = 2:

\int^{\pi}_{-\pi} {f(t) \sin (2t) dt} = b_1 \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} {\sin (t) \sin (2t) dt}<br /> + b_2 \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} {\sin^2 (2t) dt} <br /> + b_3 \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} {\sin(3t) \sin (2t) dt} + ...

\int^{\pi}_{-\pi} {f(t) \sin (2t) dt} = b_1 \cdot 0 + b_2 \cdot \pi + b_3 \cdot 0 + ...
 
Thank you. Now I understand. Thanks Thanks
 
It is easier to work with the basis functions

e_n(x) = exp(i n x)

and define the inner product as

<f,g> = 1/(2 pi) Integral from minus pi to pi of f(x)g*(x) dx
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top