B How Can I Calculate Negative Multiplication Without Following Traditional Rules?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating negative multiplication without adhering to traditional rules. A user presents a scenario of multiplying 6 pencils by negative two, concluding that 6 x -2 equals -6 based on their reasoning. However, others clarify that starting with 6 pencils means the equation should be interpreted as 6 + (-2 x 6), resulting in -6. If the initial count were zero, the outcome would be -12, emphasizing the importance of the starting value in calculations. The thread concludes with a reminder that the original post was deleted after receiving clarification, which is against forum rules.
pyroclasticsoul
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Do NOT delete your Original Post after you have received replies and help
TL;DR Summary
Negative times positive
Say I have 6 pencils. I want to times this by negative two. Now ignoring the rules that your teacher taught you work this out. 6 pencils negative 2 times. Negative one time would be 0 and another negative times would be -6 right? So 6 x - 2 = -6 according to simple logic. The calculator will say -12 but if I took 6 away from 6 3 times that would be -12.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
Mathematics news on Phys.org
pyroclasticsoul said:
TL;DR Summary: Negative times positive

Say I have 6 pencils. I want to times this by negative two. Now ignoring the rules that your teacher taught you work this out. 6 pencils negative 2 times. Negative one time would be 0 and another negative times would be -6 right? So 6 x - 2 = -6 according to simple logic. The calculator will say -12 but if I took 6 away from 6 3 times that would be -12.
No. You started out with 6. "I have 6 pencils." You're describing 6 + -2x6 which equals -6.

If you had started out with zero, then the final answer would indeed be -12.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
DaveC426913 said:
No. You started out with 6. "I have 6 pencils." You're describing 6 + -2x6 which equals -6.

If you had started out with zero, then the final answer would indeed be -12.
I thought about that but why do I start with 0 and not 6 since 6 is the number adjusted by -2.
 
pyroclasticsoul said:
why do I start with 0

Read the problem statement you wrote.

"I have 6 pencils"

The problem starts at +6 pencils.
 
Note -- the OP deleted their first post after getting help from Dave. This is not allowed. The OP text is restored and this thread is now closed.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS, Bystander and topsquark

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Death Rally: an intricate probability problem?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Is the equation 0!=1 based on flawed reasoning?
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
How to correctly round in physics?
Replies
8
Views
2K
MHB How Can You Calculate the Area of Shaded Regions in Complex Geometric Figures?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Time evolution of the electromagnetic wavefunction on a lattice
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Karatsuba multiplication implementation question
Replies
3
Views
2K
Commutative property of multiplication
Replies
8
Views
4K
MHB How can I find these coefficients?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Torque on a Pivot Point With Multiple Forces and Different Directions
Replies
6
Views
2K
I How Do You Calculate Day-Specific Phase Shifts in Excel for Sine Waves?
Replies
7
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top