How Can I Economically Join 3-Way Corners in Open Boxes Without Screws Crossing?

  • Construction
  • Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Diy Joints
In summary, the article discusses economical methods for joining 3-way corners in open boxes without using screws that may cross each other. It explores various techniques such as using dowels, biscuits, or corner brackets to achieve strong connections while maintaining an efficient assembly process. The focus is on ensuring structural integrity and ease of assembly while minimizing costs and avoiding complications from screw placement.
  • #1
DaveC426913
Gold Member
23,058
6,743
TL;DR Summary
How can I make these joints better?
I find myself making a lot of things that are open boxes - plant stands mostly.

Sometimes the wood is merely 3/4 x 3/4 nailing strips. I use deck screws to hold them together. In that case, I only use one screw, not two. (I predrill with a countersink bit or it will certainly split the wood.) Today, I made a few using 2/2s, so I used two screws, to ensure strong joints.

My trouble is, when I make a 3-way joint, the screws cross and I've busted a lot of drill bits. I try to stagger them but it's (literally) hit and miss.

Do woodworkers have a better - yet still economical - way to join these 3-way corners?

I know I could use strapping or angle brackets if I really wanted to sidestep the whole problem, but that's expensive and time-consuming. And I'm trying to make these fast, cheap and with a minimum of extra bits like brackets.


box.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What's an open box? Can you post a couple pictures of what you are building?

What tools do you have available already to do this work? Do you have a table saw? Or maybe just a circular saw or a jigsaw or a mitre saw?

Have you used any woodworking joints in the past?

1717466403384.png

https://toolstoday.com/learn/18-woodworking-joints

Paging @phinds :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21 and BillTre
  • #3
I am seldom happy with screws into end grain.
Why are these open frames?? For building a box, I usually use a box joint. Less fiddley than a tapered mortice.
 
  • #4
Use wood dowels instead of screws:



Some ideas for 3-way corner joints (at 12:25, the dowels idea is used again (may even be screws), and at 14:54, another joint that could be done with dowels or screws instead of the square part at the center):

 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213, hutchphd and BillTre
  • #5
Dave, there are a TON of joinery types on my joinery sub-gossary. Lots of good suggestions above, and here are a bunch more. Find one or two that suit you and your tools.

joinery
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes jack action, DeBangis21, hutchphd and 3 others
  • #6
@phinds that's an excellent comprehensive list. Good!
I come to know dovetail just recently from another forum.
 
  • #7
berkeman said:
What's an open box? Can you post a couple pictures of what you are building?
Indoor plant stands - 3/4"x3/4". These take me less than an hour to build.
1717510847270.jpeg

(Those tops are simply deck tiles, which cost less than 3 bucks each and come in packs of 10 :wink: )
1717512590762.png


Outdoor planters 1½"x 1½". (With fence board panels) These took about 3 hours each.
1717511051321.jpeg

berkeman said:
What tools do you have available already to do this work? Do you have a table saw? Or maybe just a circular saw or a jigsaw or a mitre saw?
I have a poor man's workshop. Old and 2nd hand stuff.
Circ saw, chop saw, 16" planer, belt sander, etc. There's prolly a router and jigsaw around here somewhere. (I'm not sure I want to get involved in routing for this level of project.)

berkeman said:
Have you used any woodworking joints in the past?
No.
hutchphd said:
For building a box, I usually use a box joint. Less fiddley than a tapered mortice.
The 3/4" wood is way too small for any kind of mitred joints. Though the 1½" is prolly OK.

Here is a 3/4" join:
1717511700998.jpeg

And here is a 1½" join (you can see where I hit a cross-screw, snapped a drill bit and had to re-drill):
1717511765145.jpeg


jack action said:
Use wood dowels instead of screws:

Some ideas for 3-way corner joints (at 12:25, the dowels idea is used again (may even be screws), and at 14:54, another joint that could be done with dowels or screws instead of the square part at the center):
Dowels might be a solution, though it doesn't really solve the 3-way join problem directly.

phinds said:
Dave, there are a TON of joinery types on my joinery sub-gossary. Lots of good suggestions above, and here are a bunch more. Find one or two that suit you and your tools.
Thanks. I knew I'd hear from you. :)

(Boy, I wish I had a dado head cutter to cut the lengthwise grooves for those outdoor planters. I had to run them through the table saw about eight times to get the 1/2" groove cut...)

(Also, fence boards make terrible slotted panels. They have a strong tendency toward "cupping", which makes it very challenging to slot them into the grooves.)

Anyway, problem with those joineries is that they might be more complex (and therefore time-consuming) than I'm hoping for. In some cases my wood is too thin for any kind of joinery. And it might be a losing battle, considering the cheap wood I am using.

This isn't fine cabinetry I'm attempting here. I'm using pretty rough wood. It has twists and knots that I have to live with. The nailing strips aren't even all the same thickness! I don't want to dramatically increase the time it takes me to build these things.


So here's an example of my situation: I could prolly add carpenter's glue to all these joints for strength, but
  1. because of the wood and imperfect tools, my joints have fair bit of play. (I'm using jigs and clamps now, but still...), so glue won't be as effective, and
  2. I'm impatient. It would kill me to glue a couple of things and then wait for 24 hours for it to dry before continuing (something that def had an impact on my plastic model building days or yore).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DeBangis21, BillTre and Nik_2213
  • #8
Glue small triangular pieces in each corner with superglue. A minute or two to cut the triangles and another minute or two to slap them in place w/ superglue, all for a set of 8 (each corner, both directions).
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, BillTre, DaveC426913 and 1 other person
  • #9
DaveC426913 said:
chop saw
Can you set your chop saw at a 45 degree angle to angle these butt joints so both cross members are supported by the vertical member?

1717515925217.png
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #10
As a DIY cat-gym builder, may I compliment you on those 'lounging shelves' ? I've fitted garden wall with a dozen shelves of decking as square tiles or side-by-side grooved planks, allowing multiple route options...

FWIW, for 'rough' wood-working, I must highly recommend the mentioned 'cross-dowel' approach to end-grain. It prevents / stabilises cracking and splitting, can also salvage near-Gordian 'knotty' problems...

( An unwritten 'Murphy Law' corollary is that any batten set against brick wall will have a quorum of 'knots' clash with optimal fixing locations: I've become adept at recursively cross-drilling and gluing 8mm dowels... )


IMGP0441comb.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, BillTre and DaveC426913
  • #11
berkeman said:
Can you set your chop saw at a 45 degree angle to angle these butt joints so both cross members are supported by the vertical member?

View attachment 346445
Yes. Although I don't see how that solves the problem. I'm not worried about supporting weight so much as making a solid joint that doesn't flex. And that change would still have two screws intersecting.
 
  • #12
phinds said:
Glue small triangular pieces in each corner with superglue. A minute or two to cut the triangles and another minute or two to slap them in place w/ superglue, all for a set of 8 (each corner, both directions).
Yeah, this may be what I do. But screws, rather than glue.
 
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
I have a poor man's workshop. Old and 2nd hand stuff.
Circ saw, chop saw, 16" planer, belt sander, etc. There's prolly a router and jigsaw around here somewhere. (I'm not sure I want to get involved in routing for this level of project.)
Old planer can often be better than new planer. Anything older that can plane a 16 inch wide board is not likely too bad for quality. I guess that depends on your definition of old.
 
  • #14
DaveC426913 said:
Yeah, this may be what I do. But screws, rather than glue.
Why screws? I didn't mean don't screw the joints, I thought you were looking for extra stability AFTER you put in the screws, to avoid racking. With these supports and superglue you could use fewer screws.
 
  • #15
phinds said:
Why screws? I didn't mean don't screw the joints, I thought you were looking for extra stability AFTER you put in the screws, to avoid racking. With these supports and superglue you could use fewer screws.
Well, the primary problem I'm trying to solve here is finding room in the joint for all the screws without snapping my drill bits, so added braces won't fix that (Oh I see. You said use fewer screws).

My experience is that glue just doesn't hold up well to torsional forces. But maybe I'll give that a try on my next build and see how it goes.

I have a staple gun that can hold tiny 1/2" brads. I could use those to supplement the glue.
 
  • #16
If you sand the edges of the triangles smooth and use medium weight superglue, it's essentially as good as screws.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #17
Here's an idea. Two screws from each cross piece into the triangle piece, plus one long deck screw through the triangle piece into the leg. And glue all joining surfaces. Everything is securely fastened, so there should be no wobbling even without the glue. The glue is then backup for the screws.
Leg Joint.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213
  • #18
jrmichler said:
Two screws from each cross piece into the triangle piece, plus one long deck screw through the triangle piece into the leg.
How are the crossmembers supported by the vertical leg in your sketch? Sorry if I'm missing the obvious.
 
  • #19
Each crossmember is rigidly attached to the triangular piece by 2 or even 4 screws. The leg is pulled into the square corner formed by the ends of the crossmembers by a long screw through the triangular piece. Pulling into the corner locks the leg against wobbling, the screw locks it against sliding, which supports the table. If all mating surfaces are flat and square, the resulting joint is rigid. Gluing the joint is not necessary, but adds redundancy and helps prevent the screws from loosening.
 
  • #20
As you know well, I'm a little slow. What is that center square in the sketch? Which crossmember does it belong to? It's the top of the vertical member, but is there overlap with one or two of the crossmembers?

1717543847495.png
 
  • #21
If a picture is worth 1000 words, two pictures should be even better. Photo below shows the crossmembers and triangular piece without the leg:
Leg Joint 2.jpg

Then the leg is added:
Leg Joint 1.jpg

This is a two minute model slapped together from the scrap box. If I was doing it for real, the triangular piece would have the grain parallel to the 45 degree face (the long face) (the hypotenuse of the right triangle face).
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21
  • #22
So the vertical weight forces of the load on the platform will 100% be supported by the screws between the horizontal members and the vertical support? Why not push the horizontal members a bit onto the vertical support?
 
  • #23
That is not unlike how chairs are assembled.
 
  • #24
Yeah, maybe what I'll do is put a little 45 brace in there - not a big one like jrmichler suggests; I'll make it out of the same wood: so 3/4". And glue it and tack it with little brads. That's doesn't add too much material or time/effort.
 
  • #25
Go composite.
I would replace all horizontal wood with a light strip of galvanised steel. Make a 90° fold along the top and the bottom to give the 'C' section directional rigidity to the legs, and to bear the top-load. Cut or bend corners at the fold ends to make space for legs. Short screws, through the sheet, would go into the external flat faces of the legs. The same system can be used for the lower, or intermediate shelves. The face of the 'C' would be between 1.5 and 2.0 times the leg width. Try phi = 1.618

Maybe you have a source of 'C' section in Al or galv iron, that can be cut and drilled without folding. Paint it, or use colour-bond shed cladding, new or used.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #26
We used small wood shelf brackets instead of simple triangles so it had some 'look'.
Also, we had the top-short one from a wider piece, so we could spread the screws a bit.
 
  • #27
DaveC426913 said:
I'm trying to solve here is finding room in the joint for all the screws without snapping my drill bits
I feel your pain. Been there. But using thicker timber and drilling at a good 'normal incidence' should avoid the problem.
 
  • #28
"Do woodworkers have a better - yet still economical - way to join these 3-way corners?"
Yes, but it sounds like you want to take an easy route. Here are three traditional joints for your application, from Fairham, Woodwork Joints. I would hold them together with a water-resistant glue (Titebond III, e.g.).
Screenshot 2024-06-05 at 10.31.28 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-06-05 at 10.30.32 AM.png

As noted above, screwing into end grain doesn't hold very well. You can insert a crosswise dowel and screw into that for better holding power. I don't have a picture but this metal version gives you the idea:
1717605414137.png
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-06-05 at 10.29.50 AM.png
    Screenshot 2024-06-05 at 10.29.50 AM.png
    26 KB · Views: 15
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, DaveC426913 and berkeman
  • #29
IIRC, the truncated right-angle of wood or metal through-fixed from hypotenuse to leg is one of the standard ways to craft a 'storable' table.
Here's pics of a complete kit and a 'roll your own'...
81ZlWmh74HL._AC_SL1500_70comb.jpg
 
  • #30
Nik_2213 said:
IIRC, the truncated right-angle of wood or metal through-fixed from hypotenuse to leg is one of the standard ways to craft a 'storable' table.
Here's pics of a complete kit and a 'roll your own'...View attachment 346544
Yes, if I were going to go this route, I'd stock up on these little guys:
Screenshot 2024-06-06 at 2.27.24 PM.png
Screenshot 2024-06-06 at 2.28.38 PM.png

but I'm trying to avoid such extra bits being added to the cost, weight and aesthetics.
 
  • Like
Likes Nik_2213 and phinds
  • #31
For that sort of three-way joint, if you're making them in any numbers a plate joiner (aka biscuit joiner) is far and away the easiest answer. Of course a real cabinet maker (the kind who can cut dovetails by hand) would be making mortise and tenon joints, but the plate joiner creates joints just as strong with a lot less work.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and BillTre
  • #32
DaveC426913 said:
TL;DR Summary: How can I make these joints better?

I find myself making a lot of things that are open boxes - plant stands mostly.

Sometimes the wood is merely 3/4 x 3/4 nailing strips. I use deck screws to hold them together. In that case, I only use one screw, not two. (I predrill with a countersink bit or it will certainly split the wood.) Today, I made a few using 2/2s, so I used two screws, to ensure strong joints.

My trouble is, when I make a 3-way joint, the screws cross and I've busted a lot of drill bits. I try to stagger them but it's (literally) hit and miss.

Do woodworkers have a better - yet still economical - way to join these 3-way corners?

I know I could use strapping or angle brackets if I really wanted to sidestep the whole problem, but that's expensive and time-consuming. And I'm trying to make these fast, cheap and with a minimum of extra bits like brackets.


View attachment 346416
 
  • #33
From experience, depends on tools. Joiner by trade so fully equipped workshop. Mortice and tenon would be a traditional way into leg but if this something of a hobby and knocked up in a shed then a mitre joint for 4 top rails, top frame, would be a choice. Mitre increases glue line area, a biscuit, as shown by others, aids location and assembly and that joint could be held by air nail/pin. If no air tools then ratchet straps work fine, though attention to keeping top fram square is a must. When I first started out, limited tools, I found "corrugated fasteners, 'dogs' or 'wriggly nails' across mitre very good and strong, angled so pulls up. Once top frame done I guess a screw down into leg would be ok, though I would prefer a fluted wooden dowel pin. Air nail / pins leave a tiny hole easily filled unlike a screw head. If you could standardise the stock then a jig would help. What machinery do you currently use
 

Attachments

  • dogs.jpg
    dogs.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 13
  • #34
Housey210 said:
If you could standardise the stock
The stock is 3/4" nailing strips. Heavily knotted and warped. About as far from standard as one can get. But very cheap.
Housey210 said:
then a jig would help.
I try to use jigs when possible. For this, I have angle clamps.
1722518688520.png

Housey210 said:
What machinery do you currently use
A drill with a counter-sink bit, deck screws, and a chop saw.

I really wish I could use my table saw, but it blows my breaker every time I start it up.
 
  • #35
DaveC426913 said:
I really wish I could use my table saw, but it blows my breaker every time I start it up.
Get a variable frequency drive. That will limit the startup current, or can be programmed for a slower speedup.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top