How can I improve my understanding of Maximum Likelihood estimators?

Thread starter benji84
Start date Apr 17, 2005
Tags

Estimators Likelihood Maximum Maximum likelihood

AI Thread Summary

To improve understanding of Maximum Likelihood Estimators (MLE), it's essential to clarify the problem involving the continuous random variable X with the given probability density function (pdf). The task is to show that the maximum likelihood estimator of theta satisfies the quadratic equation (theta)^2 + (2+a)theta + 1 = 0, where 'a' needs to be defined. Participants are encouraged to specify where they encounter difficulties and to use clearer notation for better comprehension. Additionally, it's important to identify the values for which the pdf f(x;theta) is nonzero. Engaging with these elements will enhance the grasp of MLE concepts.

Apr 17, 2005

benji84

Can anyoe help with likelihood estimtor problems?
:cry:

Physics news on Phys.org

Apr 17, 2005

benji84

It goes like this:

Let X be a continuous r.v with pdf:

f(x;theta)=theta(1+theta)x^(theta-1).(1-x)

Show that the maximum likelihood estimator of theta satisifies:

a.(theta)^2+ (2+a)theta+1=0

Apr 17, 2005

BicycleTree

What is 'a'? What values is f nonzero for? And be clearer with your notation please. Also, where are you having trouble?

Last edited: Apr 17, 2005

Thread 'Value of intuitionistic logic'

I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.

View full post »

Thread 'Formal derivation of statement from Peano Arithmetic system'

I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...

View full post »